Positive Obligations of the States in the Context of Article 3 of the European Convention

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F14%3A00101917" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/14:00101917 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Positive Obligations of the States in the Context of Article 3 of the European Convention

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The concept of (procedural) positive obligations of the states in the context of the European Convention on Human Rights has been established by the European Court of Human Rights. It is a concept where the substantial rights emerging from the Convention have their procedural limbs based on the interpretation of Article 1 of the Convention. The paper focuses concretely on Article 3. In the first part the author explains why the issue of positive obligations is important and why Article 3 was chosen. In the second part the concept of positive obligations is analysed and the division of positive obligations is described. The third part analyzes Article 3 thus there is a brief explanation what content of this Article is in the context of the ECHR case-law. The fourth part analyses what concrete positive obligations are inherent to Article 3; for that purpose the ECHR case-law is analyzed. In the last fifth part there is a conclusion devoted to the assessment of positive obligations in the context of Article 3.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Positive Obligations of the States in the Context of Article 3 of the European Convention

Popis výsledku anglicky

The concept of (procedural) positive obligations of the states in the context of the European Convention on Human Rights has been established by the European Court of Human Rights. It is a concept where the substantial rights emerging from the Convention have their procedural limbs based on the interpretation of Article 1 of the Convention. The paper focuses concretely on Article 3. In the first part the author explains why the issue of positive obligations is important and why Article 3 was chosen. In the second part the concept of positive obligations is analysed and the division of positive obligations is described. The third part analyzes Article 3 thus there is a brief explanation what content of this Article is in the context of the ECHR case-law. The fourth part analyses what concrete positive obligations are inherent to Article 3; for that purpose the ECHR case-law is analyzed. In the last fifth part there is a conclusion devoted to the assessment of positive obligations in the context of Article 3.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Cofola 2014 : The Conference Proceedings

ISBN

9788021074880

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

54-71

Název nakladatele

Masarykova univerzita, Právnická fakulta

Místo vydání

Brno

Místo konání akce

Telč

Datum konání akce

1. 1. 2014

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000449124800003