Are We Getting Good Decisions by Top-level Domain Name Dispute Resolution Providers?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F15%3A00084107" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/15:00084107 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.muni.cz/mujlt/article/view/3055/3696" target="_blank" >https://journals.muni.cz/mujlt/article/view/3055/3696</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2015-1-7" target="_blank" >10.5817/MUJLT2015-1-7</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Are We Getting Good Decisions by Top-level Domain Name Dispute Resolution Providers?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has offered unique solution to deal with disputes regarding the registration of internet domain names (so called trademark dilemma) in 1999. Uniform domain name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)delimits procedural rules to solve such disputes and to create non ? binding decision (binding between involved parties) which approves / rejects the transfer of the domain name to new (trademark) owner. This paper has to focus on the question whether weare getting good decisions or the decisions in similar cases are decided more or less randomly. It is necessary to focus on such question also because of the fact that ICANN is planned to be transferred to the global multi - stakeholder community this year. Is the decision making process ready for such a big change or is it easily suggestible? To try to answer this question it will be necessary to go through the history and activities of ICANN and to focus mainly on UDRP process.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Are We Getting Good Decisions by Top-level Domain Name Dispute Resolution Providers?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has offered unique solution to deal with disputes regarding the registration of internet domain names (so called trademark dilemma) in 1999. Uniform domain name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)delimits procedural rules to solve such disputes and to create non ? binding decision (binding between involved parties) which approves / rejects the transfer of the domain name to new (trademark) owner. This paper has to focus on the question whether weare getting good decisions or the decisions in similar cases are decided more or less randomly. It is necessary to focus on such question also because of the fact that ICANN is planned to be transferred to the global multi - stakeholder community this year. Is the decision making process ready for such a big change or is it easily suggestible? To try to answer this question it will be necessary to go through the history and activities of ICANN and to focus mainly on UDRP process.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology

ISSN

1802-5943

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

9

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

111-128

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—