Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Abkhazia and South Ossetia Foreign Economic and Political Strategy

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F17%3A00097881" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/17:00097881 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Abkhazia and South Ossetia Foreign Economic and Political Strategy

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    This article is devoted to the foreign economic and political strategy of Abkhazia and South Ossetia after the war in 2008. In fact, there are three international subjects having considerable impact on international integration of these two regions — the Russian Federation, the European Union and Georgia. The Russian Federation is the main economic and political partner called ‘a patron state’ by many countries. The European Union tries to be a mediator in this conflict. The European Union Monitoring Mission has been patrolling the administrative boundary line (ABL) since the end of the war according to the Six-point Agreement. However, this mission was not accepted by Abkhaz and South Ossetian officials and monitors cannot cross the ABL. A lot of European NGOs are performing their program in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, but because of the influence of Georgian government on their activity they have problems building confidence. Finally, Georgia claims these two territories are indivisible parts of Georgian territory, but in practice Georgian authorities have no any effective tool to act and enforce law and obedience in Abkhazia or South Ossetia. However, reconciliation with Georgia seems to be important for future overcoming of isolation of these two regions.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Abkhazia and South Ossetia Foreign Economic and Political Strategy

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    This article is devoted to the foreign economic and political strategy of Abkhazia and South Ossetia after the war in 2008. In fact, there are three international subjects having considerable impact on international integration of these two regions — the Russian Federation, the European Union and Georgia. The Russian Federation is the main economic and political partner called ‘a patron state’ by many countries. The European Union tries to be a mediator in this conflict. The European Union Monitoring Mission has been patrolling the administrative boundary line (ABL) since the end of the war according to the Six-point Agreement. However, this mission was not accepted by Abkhaz and South Ossetian officials and monitors cannot cross the ABL. A lot of European NGOs are performing their program in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, but because of the influence of Georgian government on their activity they have problems building confidence. Finally, Georgia claims these two territories are indivisible parts of Georgian territory, but in practice Georgian authorities have no any effective tool to act and enforce law and obedience in Abkhazia or South Ossetia. However, reconciliation with Georgia seems to be important for future overcoming of isolation of these two regions.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50500 - Law

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2017

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    РОССИЙСКОЕ ПРАВО ОНЛАЙН

  • ISSN

    2542-2472

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    Neuveden

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    3

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    RU - Ruská federace

  • Počet stran výsledku

    120

  • Strana od-do

    57-63

  • Kód UT WoS článku

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus