The european commission's attempts to dismantle european internal network of bilateral investment treaties: from amicus curiae to infringement proceedings

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F17%3A00113769" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/17:00113769 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/cofola-international/cofola2017.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/cofola-international/cofola2017.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The european commission's attempts to dismantle european internal network of bilateral investment treaties: from amicus curiae to infringement proceedings

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The European Commission believes that intra-EU BITs are not necessary, since the EU single market rules, in particular freedom of establishment and free movement of capital, already provide solid legal framework for cross-border European investments. Moreover, intra-EU BITs violate principle of non-discrimination, since additional investment protection is provided only to investors whose states concluded international investment agreements. Although the Commission has intervened via amicus curiae in numerous investment proceedings, tribunals have always found that they held jurisdiction over disputes and applied relevant BID. Since the European Commission cannot change the legal status of concluded international agreements, it has triggered Article 258 of the TFEU. This paper seeks to analyse various legal tools at disposal of the European Commission to dismantle European internal network of BITs. Special attention is given to the infringement proceeding launched by the Commission against 5 EU Member States in 2015.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The european commission's attempts to dismantle european internal network of bilateral investment treaties: from amicus curiae to infringement proceedings

Popis výsledku anglicky

The European Commission believes that intra-EU BITs are not necessary, since the EU single market rules, in particular freedom of establishment and free movement of capital, already provide solid legal framework for cross-border European investments. Moreover, intra-EU BITs violate principle of non-discrimination, since additional investment protection is provided only to investors whose states concluded international investment agreements. Although the Commission has intervened via amicus curiae in numerous investment proceedings, tribunals have always found that they held jurisdiction over disputes and applied relevant BID. Since the European Commission cannot change the legal status of concluded international agreements, it has triggered Article 258 of the TFEU. This paper seeks to analyse various legal tools at disposal of the European Commission to dismantle European internal network of BITs. Special attention is given to the infringement proceeding launched by the Commission against 5 EU Member States in 2015.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

COFOLA INTERNATIONAL 2017: Resolution of International Disputes Conference

ISBN

9788021087927

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

41-60

Název nakladatele

Masarykova univerzita, Právnická fakulta

Místo vydání

Brno

Místo konání akce

Telč

Datum konání akce

1. 1. 2016

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000460999300003