Political and Other Fundamental Group Rights

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F17%3A00124779" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/17:00124779 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/cofola/2017/cofola2017.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/cofola/2017/cofola2017.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Political and Other Fundamental Group Rights

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Imagine a post (be it on an online social network or elsewhere) signed with the designation “a representative of the Department of Constitutional Law and Political Science MU”. Whose political rights would be violated if the post (the opinion expressed therein) was censored? Political rights of the person who has written the post? But what if she only copied the minutes of the department’s meeting and does not hold the opinion herself? All these questions relate to the issue of fundamental group rights. The concept of fundamental group rights is a concept which often appears in case law, however, which is not legally or philosophically very much anchored. The aim of this paper is to present one of the possible approaches to anchoring of this concept. This approach consists in critical reflection on the concept of fundamental rights as such leading to the conclusion that fundamental rights are to protect ideas as they are capable of assigning values (valuating) and thus are the only entities having real intrinsic value as they stand at the beginning of the chain of valuation. Group (especially the stable ones) are worth of the same protection as individuals as both in the minds of individuals and in the exchange of ideas within groups new ideas emerge which then contributes to the robustness of the civilization.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Political and Other Fundamental Group Rights

Popis výsledku anglicky

Imagine a post (be it on an online social network or elsewhere) signed with the designation “a representative of the Department of Constitutional Law and Political Science MU”. Whose political rights would be violated if the post (the opinion expressed therein) was censored? Political rights of the person who has written the post? But what if she only copied the minutes of the department’s meeting and does not hold the opinion herself? All these questions relate to the issue of fundamental group rights. The concept of fundamental group rights is a concept which often appears in case law, however, which is not legally or philosophically very much anchored. The aim of this paper is to present one of the possible approaches to anchoring of this concept. This approach consists in critical reflection on the concept of fundamental rights as such leading to the conclusion that fundamental rights are to protect ideas as they are capable of assigning values (valuating) and thus are the only entities having real intrinsic value as they stand at the beginning of the chain of valuation. Group (especially the stable ones) are worth of the same protection as individuals as both in the minds of individuals and in the exchange of ideas within groups new ideas emerge which then contributes to the robustness of the civilization.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Cofola2017: Sborník z konference

ISBN

9788021089280

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

27

Strana od-do

1137-1163

Název nakladatele

Masarykova univerzita

Místo vydání

Brno

Místo konání akce

Telč

Datum konání akce

1. 1. 2017

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

CST - Celostátní akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—