New Approaches to the Right to be Heard in Relation to the Application of Alternatives to Administrative Sanctions

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F18%3A00100983" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/18:00100983 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://uprava.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/363/pdf_73" target="_blank" >http://uprava.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/363/pdf_73</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2018.1.9" target="_blank" >10.17573/cepar.2018.1.9</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

New Approaches to the Right to be Heard in Relation to the Application of Alternatives to Administrative Sanctions

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The right to be heard is one of the key instruments that ensure adequate protection of the participants´ rights during the proceedings before the administrative authority. This requirement is especially important in administrative offences proceedings due to fact that administrative bodies may issue also very serious sanctions and it is important to enable the offenders to influence the outcome of proceedings. Therefore may participants raise their objections, opinions, suggestions. The authors also focus on issues related to the possibility oftive offences proceedings are in all three examined different while the article deals more closely with these differences. alternative approaches to administrative sanctions and related issues concerning ensuring adequate position of offender. These questions have not yet attracted doctrinal attention. Article analyses the currently accepted new legislation on administrative offences proceeding, with overlaps resulting from the Council of Europe documents and including basic comparison with the processing on administrative offences in Germany and Poland. In addition, to the basic analysis of the new legislation benefits, the authors pay attention to the new instrument of “legal settlement” that allows administrative authorities to approve agreemeint between offender and injured party about committed administrative offence and the associated remedy. The new institute is worthy researching, particularly because it is one of the first attempts to adopt alternative approaches to administrative offences proceedings and brings new challenges for administrative authorities. This new institute is compared with the legislation in Germany and Poland. Also methods of analysis of legal requirements of legal documents of Council of Europe and national legislation, normative analysis, literature review and deduction were used in this connection. Authors reached a rather interesting conclusion that the approaches to ADR in administrative offences proceedings are in all three examined different while the article deals more closely with these differences.

Název v anglickém jazyce

New Approaches to the Right to be Heard in Relation to the Application of Alternatives to Administrative Sanctions

Popis výsledku anglicky

The right to be heard is one of the key instruments that ensure adequate protection of the participants´ rights during the proceedings before the administrative authority. This requirement is especially important in administrative offences proceedings due to fact that administrative bodies may issue also very serious sanctions and it is important to enable the offenders to influence the outcome of proceedings. Therefore may participants raise their objections, opinions, suggestions. The authors also focus on issues related to the possibility oftive offences proceedings are in all three examined different while the article deals more closely with these differences. alternative approaches to administrative sanctions and related issues concerning ensuring adequate position of offender. These questions have not yet attracted doctrinal attention. Article analyses the currently accepted new legislation on administrative offences proceeding, with overlaps resulting from the Council of Europe documents and including basic comparison with the processing on administrative offences in Germany and Poland. In addition, to the basic analysis of the new legislation benefits, the authors pay attention to the new instrument of “legal settlement” that allows administrative authorities to approve agreemeint between offender and injured party about committed administrative offence and the associated remedy. The new institute is worthy researching, particularly because it is one of the first attempts to adopt alternative approaches to administrative offences proceedings and brings new challenges for administrative authorities. This new institute is compared with the legislation in Germany and Poland. Also methods of analysis of legal requirements of legal documents of Council of Europe and national legislation, normative analysis, literature review and deduction were used in this connection. Authors reached a rather interesting conclusion that the approaches to ADR in administrative offences proceedings are in all three examined different while the article deals more closely with these differences.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA13-30730S" target="_blank" >GA13-30730S: Prostředky ochrany subjektivních práv ve veřejné správě, jejich systém a efektivnost</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Central European Public Administration Review

ISSN

2591-2240

e-ISSN

2591-2259

Svazek periodika

16

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

SI - Slovinská republika

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

161-178

Kód UT WoS článku

000461519400009

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—