Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Corruption and International Arbitration - The Arbitrators' Right to Investigate Corruption Sua Sponte

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F18%3A00108928" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/18:00108928 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/cofola-international/cofola2018.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/cofola-international/cofola2018.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Corruption and International Arbitration - The Arbitrators' Right to Investigate Corruption Sua Sponte

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Arbitration is a dispute resolution mechanism which is constituted upon party’s autonomy to settle a dispute in a private and confidential way. Criminal law on the other hand can be considered as a restriction on party’s autonomy since it protects general interests. Nevertheless, the paths of these two disciplines cross on the way to a fair and square decision. Arbitrators participate in this proceeding as private persons appointed through the arbitration agreements by parties. On the other hand, they are still playing an important role on the field of the international commercial business. The arbitration may be considered as a potential tool for a criminal conduct since arbitrators are measured as servants of individual private interests of parties. However, as globalization reflects itself in the growth of international trade and transactions, the same applies to the international arbitration. Arbitrators are servants of parties as much as they are guardians of ethics and moral behavior within the international trade. One may argue that arbitrators are ill-suited for an adjudication of such claims because of the nature of arbitration. The reason behind this statement is that rights and duties of arbitrators in combat with corruption during arbitral proceedings are limited. This paper focuses exactly on this issue. What is the position of arbitrators when they are facing corrupt activities of the parties? Could they commence the investigation and resolve this matter on their own?

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Corruption and International Arbitration - The Arbitrators' Right to Investigate Corruption Sua Sponte

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Arbitration is a dispute resolution mechanism which is constituted upon party’s autonomy to settle a dispute in a private and confidential way. Criminal law on the other hand can be considered as a restriction on party’s autonomy since it protects general interests. Nevertheless, the paths of these two disciplines cross on the way to a fair and square decision. Arbitrators participate in this proceeding as private persons appointed through the arbitration agreements by parties. On the other hand, they are still playing an important role on the field of the international commercial business. The arbitration may be considered as a potential tool for a criminal conduct since arbitrators are measured as servants of individual private interests of parties. However, as globalization reflects itself in the growth of international trade and transactions, the same applies to the international arbitration. Arbitrators are servants of parties as much as they are guardians of ethics and moral behavior within the international trade. One may argue that arbitrators are ill-suited for an adjudication of such claims because of the nature of arbitration. The reason behind this statement is that rights and duties of arbitrators in combat with corruption during arbitral proceedings are limited. This paper focuses exactly on this issue. What is the position of arbitrators when they are facing corrupt activities of the parties? Could they commence the investigation and resolve this matter on their own?

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50501 - Law

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2018

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    COFOLA International 2018

  • ISBN

    9788021090644

  • ISSN

    2464-8485

  • e-ISSN

  • Počet stran výsledku

    21

  • Strana od-do

    39-59

  • Název nakladatele

    Masarykova univerzita

  • Místo vydání

    Brno, Česká republika

  • Místo konání akce

    Telč, Česká republika

  • Datum konání akce

    1. 1. 2018

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    EUR - Evropská akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000461000000003