Case Law Retrieval: Critical Evaluation of Czech Legal Information Retrieval Systems

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F19%3A00107284" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/19:00107284 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/en/issues/2019/IRIS/case-law-retrieval--_186fdccb91.html" target="_blank" >https://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/en/issues/2019/IRIS/case-law-retrieval--_186fdccb91.html</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Case Law Retrieval: Critical Evaluation of Czech Legal Information Retrieval Systems

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper is concerned with a critical evaluation of three widely used Czech legal information retrieval systems: ASPI, Beck-online and Codexis. The legal information retrieved from these systems shape the existing Czech legal practice. Thus, the issue of how reliable their results are when compared to each other is of utmost importance. The paper reports results of an experiment aiming to frame the discussion on information retrieval from the Czech systems. The experiment uses relation-based searches to create three sets of court decisions. The union of these sets establishes ideal databases for individual research tasks that allow for a comparison of the Recall and the Precision of the individual systems. To assess relevance of documents in a system-independent way, three lawyers (two experts and a non-expert) provided for a binary coding of the relevance of the individual court decisions.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Case Law Retrieval: Critical Evaluation of Czech Legal Information Retrieval Systems

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper is concerned with a critical evaluation of three widely used Czech legal information retrieval systems: ASPI, Beck-online and Codexis. The legal information retrieved from these systems shape the existing Czech legal practice. Thus, the issue of how reliable their results are when compared to each other is of utmost importance. The paper reports results of an experiment aiming to frame the discussion on information retrieval from the Czech systems. The experiment uses relation-based searches to create three sets of court decisions. The union of these sets establishes ideal databases for individual research tasks that allow for a comparison of the Recall and the Precision of the individual systems. To assess relevance of documents in a system-independent way, three lawyers (two experts and a non-expert) provided for a binary coding of the relevance of the individual court decisions.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA17-20645S" target="_blank" >GA17-20645S: Exaktní hodnocení aplikační relevance judikatury</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Jusletter IT

ISSN

1664-848X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

4

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

21. Februar 2019

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

1-8

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85073050820