Tax Administration of Large Taxpayers in Some CEE and CIS Countries
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F19%3A00110823" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/19:00110823 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.dialogcampus.hu/hu/folyoiratok/public-governance-administration-and-finances-law-review-20182" target="_blank" >http://www.dialogcampus.hu/hu/folyoiratok/public-governance-administration-and-finances-law-review-20182</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Tax Administration of Large Taxpayers in Some CEE and CIS Countries
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
We compare tax administration of large taxpayers in Croatia, the Czech Republic, Russia, Poland and Kazakhstan. Our hypothesis is that these units of tax administrations play an important role in collecting public revenue as well as preventing tax evasion in a dynamic global economy. We provide evidences about the most important characteristics of large taxpayer offices, their normative definitions, scope of work and positive as well as negative aspects of their practice. Some data are compared between countries and some for each country separately, due to the fact that differences in the above-mentioned countries, in size, economic and political aspects, vary substantially. Moreover, we were confronted with the limited scope of available information what made our comparison even more challengeable. Therefore, this work is, in a way, a pioneer attempt to compare specific national LTOs in one place. Our findings support the discussion that prove the hypothesis and enable recommendations.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Tax Administration of Large Taxpayers in Some CEE and CIS Countries
Popis výsledku anglicky
We compare tax administration of large taxpayers in Croatia, the Czech Republic, Russia, Poland and Kazakhstan. Our hypothesis is that these units of tax administrations play an important role in collecting public revenue as well as preventing tax evasion in a dynamic global economy. We provide evidences about the most important characteristics of large taxpayer offices, their normative definitions, scope of work and positive as well as negative aspects of their practice. Some data are compared between countries and some for each country separately, due to the fact that differences in the above-mentioned countries, in size, economic and political aspects, vary substantially. Moreover, we were confronted with the limited scope of available information what made our comparison even more challengeable. Therefore, this work is, in a way, a pioneer attempt to compare specific national LTOs in one place. Our findings support the discussion that prove the hypothesis and enable recommendations.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review in the European Union and Central and Eastern Europe
ISSN
2498-6275
e-ISSN
2498-6275
Svazek periodika
2018
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
HU - Maďarsko
Počet stran výsledku
23
Strana od-do
5-27
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—