Architecture of the Strasbourg System of Human Rights
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F20%3A00114404" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/20:00114404 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Domestic-Judicial-Treatment-of-European-Court-of-Human-Rights-Case-Law/Kosar-Petrov-Sipulova-Smekal-Vyhnanek-Janovsky/p/book/9780367361167" target="_blank" >https://www.routledge.com/Domestic-Judicial-Treatment-of-European-Court-of-Human-Rights-Case-Law/Kosar-Petrov-Sipulova-Smekal-Vyhnanek-Janovsky/p/book/9780367361167</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Architecture of the Strasbourg System of Human Rights
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This chapter sketches the basic features of the domestic effects of the Strasbourg judgments, namely the inter partes effect and the so-called res interpretata effect. It also presents the typical roles domestic authorities play in the processes of the ECtHR’s case law implementation, and shows their “diffusing” and “filtering” functions vis-a-vis the Strasbourg Court. Subsequently, it problematizes the model of diffusers and filters, and provides a more nuanced account of the domestic actors’ significance in the Convention system. In the chapter, it is concluded that the implementation process and its outcome depend on (1) the number of (domestic) actors taking part in the implementation process, (2) their stances towards the ECtHR’s judgment to be implemented, (3) mutual relations and interactions among these actors, and (4) their respective power within the system and their ability and readiness to act.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Architecture of the Strasbourg System of Human Rights
Popis výsledku anglicky
This chapter sketches the basic features of the domestic effects of the Strasbourg judgments, namely the inter partes effect and the so-called res interpretata effect. It also presents the typical roles domestic authorities play in the processes of the ECtHR’s case law implementation, and shows their “diffusing” and “filtering” functions vis-a-vis the Strasbourg Court. Subsequently, it problematizes the model of diffusers and filters, and provides a more nuanced account of the domestic actors’ significance in the Convention system. In the chapter, it is concluded that the implementation process and its outcome depend on (1) the number of (domestic) actors taking part in the implementation process, (2) their stances towards the ECtHR’s judgment to be implemented, (3) mutual relations and interactions among these actors, and (4) their respective power within the system and their ability and readiness to act.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA16-09415S" target="_blank" >GA16-09415S: Beyond Compliance - Implementace rozhodnutí mezinárodních lidskoprávních těles na národní úrovni</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
Domestic Judicial Treatment of European Court of Human Rights Case Law: Beyond Compliance
ISBN
9780367361167
Počet stran výsledku
17
Strana od-do
19-35
Počet stran knihy
306
Název nakladatele
Routledge
Místo vydání
Abingdon
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
000783692500003