Digital Content Portability and its Relation to Conformity with the Contract
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F21%3A00121871" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/21:00121871 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://journals.muni.cz/mujlt/article/view/13986" target="_blank" >https://journals.muni.cz/mujlt/article/view/13986</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2021-1-3" target="_blank" >10.5817/MUJLT2021-1-3</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Digital Content Portability and its Relation to Conformity with the Contract
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In this paper, the author analyses the possible convergences and divergences of two pieces of EU legislation: The Portability Regulation and the Digital Content Directive. Both EU laws address the issue of access to digital content from different perspectives and complement each other. However, they use different legal terminology and, in some respects, have a different scope of application (mainly about the requirement of monetary counter-performance). The Portability Regulation focuses on the cross-border portability of digital content [Art. 3 (1) Portability Regulation), while the Digital Content Directive specifies the consumer rights related to the distribution of digital content and subsumes the accessibility of digital content under the concept of "conformity of the digital content with the contract" [Art. 6 (1), (2) Digital Content Directive]. The author explains that the consumer who is not allowed to use the digital content in the EU Member States besides the Member State of his or her residence should be entitled to assert legal claims arising from the non-conformity of the digital content with the contract.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Digital Content Portability and its Relation to Conformity with the Contract
Popis výsledku anglicky
In this paper, the author analyses the possible convergences and divergences of two pieces of EU legislation: The Portability Regulation and the Digital Content Directive. Both EU laws address the issue of access to digital content from different perspectives and complement each other. However, they use different legal terminology and, in some respects, have a different scope of application (mainly about the requirement of monetary counter-performance). The Portability Regulation focuses on the cross-border portability of digital content [Art. 3 (1) Portability Regulation), while the Digital Content Directive specifies the consumer rights related to the distribution of digital content and subsumes the accessibility of digital content under the concept of "conformity of the digital content with the contract" [Art. 6 (1), (2) Digital Content Directive]. The author explains that the consumer who is not allowed to use the digital content in the EU Member States besides the Member State of his or her residence should be entitled to assert legal claims arising from the non-conformity of the digital content with the contract.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology
ISSN
1802-5943
e-ISSN
1802-5951
Svazek periodika
15
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
32
Strana od-do
53-84
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85110780635