Reforming to Please: A Comprehensive Explanation for Non-Exit from the European Court of Human Rights

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F21%3A00123051" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/21:00123051 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-constitutional-law-review/article/reforming-to-please-a-comprehensive-explanation-for-nonexit-from-the-european-court-of-human-rights/7CC58B6575235D3819DBB9693DA84673#article" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-constitutional-law-review/article/reforming-to-please-a-comprehensive-explanation-for-nonexit-from-the-european-court-of-human-rights/7CC58B6575235D3819DBB9693DA84673#article</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1574019621000377" target="_blank" >10.1017/S1574019621000377</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Reforming to Please: A Comprehensive Explanation for Non-Exit from the European Court of Human Rights

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

States’ growing dissatisfaction with the performance of the European Court of Human Rights – Governments’ commitment to reform process – Threats of exit that failed to materialise – Adaptation of Hirschman’s exit–voice–loyalty framework to explain states’ non-exit from the European Court of Human Rights – Sufficiently effective voice, manifestations of loyalty, and high costs of exit as possible reasons behind non-exit – Governments’ inability to achieve change in the Court’s practice unilaterally – Divergent perceptions and expectations of governments – Court’s responsiveness to governments’ concerns – Showing the importance of cautious, incremental changes to accommodate diverse governmental expectations on the role of the European Court of Human Rights

Název v anglickém jazyce

Reforming to Please: A Comprehensive Explanation for Non-Exit from the European Court of Human Rights

Popis výsledku anglicky

States’ growing dissatisfaction with the performance of the European Court of Human Rights – Governments’ commitment to reform process – Threats of exit that failed to materialise – Adaptation of Hirschman’s exit–voice–loyalty framework to explain states’ non-exit from the European Court of Human Rights – Sufficiently effective voice, manifestations of loyalty, and high costs of exit as possible reasons behind non-exit – Governments’ inability to achieve change in the Court’s practice unilaterally – Divergent perceptions and expectations of governments – Court’s responsiveness to governments’ concerns – Showing the importance of cautious, incremental changes to accommodate diverse governmental expectations on the role of the European Court of Human Rights

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Constitutional Law Review

ISSN

1574-0196

e-ISSN

1744-5515

Svazek periodika

17

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

24

Strana od-do

664-687

Kód UT WoS článku

000759454300006

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85120569815