National Identity and Judicial Minimalism: Exploring the CJEU’s Restraint in Adjudicating National Identity

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F21%3A00124552" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/21:00124552 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/iclr-2021-0014" target="_blank" >https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/iclr-2021-0014</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0014" target="_blank" >10.2478/iclr-2021-0014</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

National Identity and Judicial Minimalism: Exploring the CJEU’s Restraint in Adjudicating National Identity

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Even thought the Court of Justice of the EU has already decided a number of cases dealing with national identity, judicial clarification of the concept is still missing. On the contrary, the reasoning employed in the Court’s case-law leaves a lot to be desired. This article explores the reasons that lead the Court to underarticulating its decisions in identity cases. I argue that the Court’s minimalism in adjudicating national identity is rooted not only in reasons driving the Court’s general minimalist approach, but also in considerations specific to identity cases. These reasons include the national identity’s inherent potential to hinder European integration, the sensitivity of determining the content of Member States’ national identities by a supranational court, the attempts to obscure the Court’s receptivity of identity arguments, and the potential to widen the applicability of its identity rulings.

Název v anglickém jazyce

National Identity and Judicial Minimalism: Exploring the CJEU’s Restraint in Adjudicating National Identity

Popis výsledku anglicky

Even thought the Court of Justice of the EU has already decided a number of cases dealing with national identity, judicial clarification of the concept is still missing. On the contrary, the reasoning employed in the Court’s case-law leaves a lot to be desired. This article explores the reasons that lead the Court to underarticulating its decisions in identity cases. I argue that the Court’s minimalism in adjudicating national identity is rooted not only in reasons driving the Court’s general minimalist approach, but also in considerations specific to identity cases. These reasons include the national identity’s inherent potential to hinder European integration, the sensitivity of determining the content of Member States’ national identities by a supranational court, the attempts to obscure the Court’s receptivity of identity arguments, and the potential to widen the applicability of its identity rulings.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International and Comparative Law Review

ISSN

1213-8770

e-ISSN

2464-6601

Svazek periodika

21

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

28

Strana od-do

68-95

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85127894943