Judicial Self-Governance Index: Towards Better Understanding of the Role of Judges in Governing the Judiciary

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F22%3A00125103" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/22:00125103 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12453" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12453</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.12453" target="_blank" >10.1111/rego.12453</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Judicial Self-Governance Index: Towards Better Understanding of the Role of Judges in Governing the Judiciary

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim of this article is to introduce a novel view on how to evaluate the share of power held by judges in judicial governance. Its contribution to court administration and the regulation of judges is three-fold. First, it provides a novel empirically tested conceptualization of judicial governance that includes 60 competences grouped into eight dimensions (ranging from selection and education of judges to case allocation and publication of judicial decisions). Second, it proposes a new Judicial Self-Governance Index which measures how much power domestic judges hold in these eight dimensions of judicial governance. Third, by applying the JSG index to the longitudinal data for Germany, Italy, Czechia and Slovakia this paper demonstrates that the Judicial Council model is not the only institutional model of judicial governance leading to the empowerment of judges. This means that judges can hold many powers without the existence of judicial councils and even in the Ministry of Justice model.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Judicial Self-Governance Index: Towards Better Understanding of the Role of Judges in Governing the Judiciary

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim of this article is to introduce a novel view on how to evaluate the share of power held by judges in judicial governance. Its contribution to court administration and the regulation of judges is three-fold. First, it provides a novel empirically tested conceptualization of judicial governance that includes 60 competences grouped into eight dimensions (ranging from selection and education of judges to case allocation and publication of judicial decisions). Second, it proposes a new Judicial Self-Governance Index which measures how much power domestic judges hold in these eight dimensions of judicial governance. Third, by applying the JSG index to the longitudinal data for Germany, Italy, Czechia and Slovakia this paper demonstrates that the Judicial Council model is not the only institutional model of judicial governance leading to the empowerment of judges. This means that judges can hold many powers without the existence of judicial councils and even in the Ministry of Justice model.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Regulation & Governance

ISSN

1748-5983

e-ISSN

1748-5991

Svazek periodika

Neuveden

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Neuveden

Stát vydavatele periodika

AU - Austrálie

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

22-42

Kód UT WoS článku

000737891900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85122218233