Tolerance as Suppressed Disapproval
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F22%3A00129090" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/22:00129090 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://journal.telospress.com/content/2022/199/107.full.pdf+html" target="_blank" >http://journal.telospress.com/content/2022/199/107.full.pdf+html</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3817/0622199107" target="_blank" >10.3817/0622199107</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Tolerance as Suppressed Disapproval
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In this text, I am going to deal with the concept of tolerance. I ask the question: What do we do when we tolerate something? There is a simple answer: To tolerate something means not to disapprove of it. But this answer is wrong because it does not distinguish tolerance from approval and indifference. I will argue that tolerance is a second-order attitude. To tolerate something means to suppress one’s own disapproval of it. Tolerance is based on the ability of an individual to self-control, to endure and to forbear. My approach has a paradoxical consequence. Tolerance is traditionally understood as a typically liberal attitude or virtue. But when we properly understand the concept of tolerance, we will see that tolerance has a limited role to play in a liberal society. This paradoxical consequence can be resolved by distinguishing positive and negative liberalism. You can be a liberal person in virtue of your liberal views and/or in virtue of your tolerance.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Tolerance as Suppressed Disapproval
Popis výsledku anglicky
In this text, I am going to deal with the concept of tolerance. I ask the question: What do we do when we tolerate something? There is a simple answer: To tolerate something means not to disapprove of it. But this answer is wrong because it does not distinguish tolerance from approval and indifference. I will argue that tolerance is a second-order attitude. To tolerate something means to suppress one’s own disapproval of it. Tolerance is based on the ability of an individual to self-control, to endure and to forbear. My approach has a paradoxical consequence. Tolerance is traditionally understood as a typically liberal attitude or virtue. But when we properly understand the concept of tolerance, we will see that tolerance has a limited role to play in a liberal society. This paradoxical consequence can be resolved by distinguishing positive and negative liberalism. You can be a liberal person in virtue of your liberal views and/or in virtue of your tolerance.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA20-10464S" target="_blank" >GA20-10464S: Kontextuální vazby justifikace lidských práv jako problém právní filosofie</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Telos
ISSN
0090-6514
e-ISSN
1940-459X
Svazek periodika
199
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
Summer
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
18
Strana od-do
107-124
Kód UT WoS článku
000818564100011
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85153489645