Archetypes in a Social Representation of a Dignified Judge (Demonstrated on Judge Dee)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F22%3A00129399" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/22:00129399 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.slsa.ac.uk/" target="_blank" >https://www.slsa.ac.uk/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Archetypes in a Social Representation of a Dignified Judge (Demonstrated on Judge Dee)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Legal ethics is fast becoming a crucial field of legal research even in continental Europe (eg. Sobek 2019). There is a growing body of literature that recognizes the importance of key legal concepts of legal ethics (eg. Phillips 2016). However, many of these concepts are also vague legal terms. As such, they are usually interpreted and applied theoretically. Yet, for example, the content of the term „dignified judge“ is necessarily determined by the social consensus on what is considered „dignified“ so we need to know this consensus to apply the term correctly. In our long-term project, we have chosen to explore legal concepts by methods of studying their social representations. In this part of our project, we use hierarchical evocation (Abric, 2005) for studying the legal concept of „dignified judge“. This method is a simple production task with a free-association basis. In our research, we collected answers from legal professionals with an emphasis on the judiciary. Results of our research showed that a concept of a dignified judge in the Czech Republic consists of several archetypes. These archetypes can be best demonstrated and explained in the example of Judge Dee (van Gulik). It shows that this particular concept is very similar even in very different cultural backgrounds and even both in art and legal academia.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Archetypes in a Social Representation of a Dignified Judge (Demonstrated on Judge Dee)

Popis výsledku anglicky

Legal ethics is fast becoming a crucial field of legal research even in continental Europe (eg. Sobek 2019). There is a growing body of literature that recognizes the importance of key legal concepts of legal ethics (eg. Phillips 2016). However, many of these concepts are also vague legal terms. As such, they are usually interpreted and applied theoretically. Yet, for example, the content of the term „dignified judge“ is necessarily determined by the social consensus on what is considered „dignified“ so we need to know this consensus to apply the term correctly. In our long-term project, we have chosen to explore legal concepts by methods of studying their social representations. In this part of our project, we use hierarchical evocation (Abric, 2005) for studying the legal concept of „dignified judge“. This method is a simple production task with a free-association basis. In our research, we collected answers from legal professionals with an emphasis on the judiciary. Results of our research showed that a concept of a dignified judge in the Czech Republic consists of several archetypes. These archetypes can be best demonstrated and explained in the example of Judge Dee (van Gulik). It shows that this particular concept is very similar even in very different cultural backgrounds and even both in art and legal academia.

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA20-10171S" target="_blank" >GA20-10171S: Využití metod sociální reprezentace v analýze právních konceptů</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů