Constitutional Conventions Concerning the Judiciary beyond the Common Law

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F23%3A00133742" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/23:00133742 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/german-law-journal/article/constitutional-conventions-concerning-the-judiciary-beyond-the-common-law/BBEAEA435D5C3DB694E64B4CA8929FF5" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/german-law-journal/article/constitutional-conventions-concerning-the-judiciary-beyond-the-common-law/BBEAEA435D5C3DB694E64B4CA8929FF5</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.90" target="_blank" >10.1017/glj.2023.90</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Constitutional Conventions Concerning the Judiciary beyond the Common Law

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Constitutional conventions are traditionally understood as socially binding, usually unwritten, rules of constitutional importance based on precedent which cannot be enforced before courts. This traditional approach has several limitations, because it debates the normative quality of conventions rather than how to find them and where the real power lies. By doing so it is disconnected from scholarship on informal institutions in social sciences. Moreover, scholarship on constitutional conventions focuses predominantly on common law countries and conventions concerning political branches. This article pushes the boundaries in both directions. It shows how constitutional conventions can be conceptualized in civil law jurisdictions, and also identifies informal practices and constitutional conventions governing the judiciaries. On a broader level, it argues that constitutional conventions as a normative concept can help to filter the informal practices and differentiate between simple repetitive behavior on the one hand and conventions as a subset of informal institutions on the other.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Constitutional Conventions Concerning the Judiciary beyond the Common Law

Popis výsledku anglicky

Constitutional conventions are traditionally understood as socially binding, usually unwritten, rules of constitutional importance based on precedent which cannot be enforced before courts. This traditional approach has several limitations, because it debates the normative quality of conventions rather than how to find them and where the real power lies. By doing so it is disconnected from scholarship on informal institutions in social sciences. Moreover, scholarship on constitutional conventions focuses predominantly on common law countries and conventions concerning political branches. This article pushes the boundaries in both directions. It shows how constitutional conventions can be conceptualized in civil law jurisdictions, and also identifies informal practices and constitutional conventions governing the judiciaries. On a broader level, it argues that constitutional conventions as a normative concept can help to filter the informal practices and differentiate between simple repetitive behavior on the one hand and conventions as a subset of informal institutions on the other.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

German Law Journal

ISSN

2071-8322

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

24

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

8

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

1503-1519

Kód UT WoS článku

001193351300004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85187501963