The role of privacy in the establishment of the right not to be subject to automated decision-making

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F24%3A00136109" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/24:00136109 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://tlq.ilaw.cas.cz/index.php/tlq/article/view/598" target="_blank" >https://tlq.ilaw.cas.cz/index.php/tlq/article/view/598</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The role of privacy in the establishment of the right not to be subject to automated decision-making

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Despite the rise in processes that are being automated in our daily life not much attention has been directed at the regulation of automation as such, that is not tied expressly to the technology that is being used for the automation. This holds true for automated decision-making, which can in its public form have a great impact on the individual’s life. As such, automated decision-making has only been regulated as a part of privacy- oriented legal instruments, which naturally begs the questions, whether the right to not be subject to automated decision-making is in fact a privacy related right. The article attempts to answer this question by identifying the place of the right to not be subject to automated decision-making within one of the privacy types, identified in extensive typology of Koops et al. It further posits several other legal values, that are different from privacy, that could warrant the placement of this right within the existing legal instruments.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The role of privacy in the establishment of the right not to be subject to automated decision-making

Popis výsledku anglicky

Despite the rise in processes that are being automated in our daily life not much attention has been directed at the regulation of automation as such, that is not tied expressly to the technology that is being used for the automation. This holds true for automated decision-making, which can in its public form have a great impact on the individual’s life. As such, automated decision-making has only been regulated as a part of privacy- oriented legal instruments, which naturally begs the questions, whether the right to not be subject to automated decision-making is in fact a privacy related right. The article attempts to answer this question by identifying the place of the right to not be subject to automated decision-making within one of the privacy types, identified in extensive typology of Koops et al. It further posits several other legal values, that are different from privacy, that could warrant the placement of this right within the existing legal instruments.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Lawyer Quarterly

ISSN

1805-8396

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

14

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

236-251

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85201535539