National constitutional courts’ use of the ECJ's precedents: The case study of Czechia

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F24%3A00136625" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/24:00136625 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X241260048" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X241260048</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1023263X241260048" target="_blank" >10.1177/1023263X241260048</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

National constitutional courts’ use of the ECJ's precedents: The case study of Czechia

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article interrogates how Member States’ constitutional courts make use of the case-law of the European Court of Justice. Instead of focusing on the extreme instances of open backlash, we put forward a data-driven methodological approach to the study of Europeanization of national constitutional courts. Drawing on the use of automatic text analysis, we suggest that searching for the formal citations of the rulings of the European Court of Justice in the constitutional courts’ case-law contributes to nuanced understanding of their role within the EU. By means of a case study of the Czech Constitutional Court's case-law (more than 71 000 decisions issued between the years 2004 and 2022), we demonstrate a way to explore the so far under-researched area of EU law adjudication where the majority of strategic behaviour might be taking place.

Název v anglickém jazyce

National constitutional courts’ use of the ECJ's precedents: The case study of Czechia

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article interrogates how Member States’ constitutional courts make use of the case-law of the European Court of Justice. Instead of focusing on the extreme instances of open backlash, we put forward a data-driven methodological approach to the study of Europeanization of national constitutional courts. Drawing on the use of automatic text analysis, we suggest that searching for the formal citations of the rulings of the European Court of Justice in the constitutional courts’ case-law contributes to nuanced understanding of their role within the EU. By means of a case study of the Czech Constitutional Court's case-law (more than 71 000 decisions issued between the years 2004 and 2022), we demonstrate a way to explore the so far under-researched area of EU law adjudication where the majority of strategic behaviour might be taking place.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EF19_073%2F0016943" target="_blank" >EF19_073/0016943: Interní grantová agentura Masarykovy univerzity</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law

ISSN

1023-263X

e-ISSN

2399-5548

Svazek periodika

31

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

25

Strana od-do

360-384

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85199449695