Enhancing Legitimacy of Content Moderation

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F24%3A00136994" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/24:00136994 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.jipitec.eu/jipitec/article/view/32" target="_blank" >https://www.jipitec.eu/jipitec/article/view/32</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Enhancing Legitimacy of Content Moderation

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Platforms are actively developing strategies to enhance the legitimacy of their content moderation and gain acceptance and trust across diverse user groups. This paper explores one such strategy, endorsed by the EU regulator, which involves proceduralizing content moderation, with a focus on copyright enforcement as a case study. However, the paper raises concerns regarding the efficacy of proceduralization in legitimizing content moderation, citing historical limitations in the adoption of dispute resolution mechanisms by ordinary users. In response, the paper suggests a complementary approach: integrating elements of procedural justice, based on users’ perceptions of fairness, into the implementation of content moderation requirements mandated by regulators. By elucidating how procedural justice enhances legitimacy and drawing from user experiences with content moderation, the paper proposes a preliminary index of procedural justice values to be used as a metric and guidance for putting regulatory requirements into practice.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Enhancing Legitimacy of Content Moderation

Popis výsledku anglicky

Platforms are actively developing strategies to enhance the legitimacy of their content moderation and gain acceptance and trust across diverse user groups. This paper explores one such strategy, endorsed by the EU regulator, which involves proceduralizing content moderation, with a focus on copyright enforcement as a case study. However, the paper raises concerns regarding the efficacy of proceduralization in legitimizing content moderation, citing historical limitations in the adoption of dispute resolution mechanisms by ordinary users. In response, the paper suggests a complementary approach: integrating elements of procedural justice, based on users’ perceptions of fairness, into the implementation of content moderation requirements mandated by regulators. By elucidating how procedural justice enhances legitimacy and drawing from user experiences with content moderation, the paper proposes a preliminary index of procedural justice values to be used as a metric and guidance for putting regulatory requirements into practice.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law

ISSN

2190-3387

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

15

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

2-12

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85197628124