The issue of proportionality: Re-use of personal data from public registers
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F24%3A00137516" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/24:00137516 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.ivir.nl/plsce2024/accepted-abstracts/" target="_blank" >https://www.ivir.nl/plsce2024/accepted-abstracts/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The issue of proportionality: Re-use of personal data from public registers
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The article examines proportionality in data protection law, particularly in the context of public register data re-use. Analyzing recent CJEU case law and EU legislation, it explores whether the proportionality test can yield different results at EU and member state levels. While CJEU tends to favor personal data protection over transparency, the article argues that societal context matters - factors like corruption levels or democratic institution health in different member states may justify varied outcomes. The analysis shows that proportionality assessment should reflect specific national contexts without undermining EU law uniformity. This is particularly relevant for countries where broader public access to personal data from public registers might be necessary to fight corruption effectively.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The issue of proportionality: Re-use of personal data from public registers
Popis výsledku anglicky
The article examines proportionality in data protection law, particularly in the context of public register data re-use. Analyzing recent CJEU case law and EU legislation, it explores whether the proportionality test can yield different results at EU and member state levels. While CJEU tends to favor personal data protection over transparency, the article argues that societal context matters - factors like corruption levels or democratic institution health in different member states may justify varied outcomes. The analysis shows that proportionality assessment should reflect specific national contexts without undermining EU law uniformity. This is particularly relevant for countries where broader public access to personal data from public registers might be necessary to fight corruption effectively.
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/LX22NPO5101" target="_blank" >LX22NPO5101: Národní institut pro výzkum socioekonomických dopadů nemocí a systémových rizik</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů