Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Judicial Resistance: The Shield and The Sword of Informality

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F24%3A00137550" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/24:00137550 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-informality-and-courts.html" target="_blank" >https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-informality-and-courts.html</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Judicial Resistance: The Shield and The Sword of Informality

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    How do courts react to political interferences? A lot has been written on populist and autocratic leaders rigging the courts. Last decades are full of examples showing that courts can indeed be an easy target for governments enjoying large parliamentary majorities and little respect to the rule of law. Examples from Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Ukraine, Turkey, Bolivia, or the USA confirm that political leaders skilfully navigate through a set of informal and formal strategies how to manipulate courts’s composition and decision-making. Nevertheless, only minor attention has so far been devoted to judicial reactions to political interferences. As this chapter demonstrates, courts are no passive observers of court-rigging efforts. On the contrary, they do retaliate implementing a wide scope of strategies going way beyond formal legal review of their government’s actions. This chapter analyses examples of judicial reactions to political interferences and zeroes in on the role of informal tools, practices and techniques in building democratic resilience of courts. Offering a categorization of resistance strategies, it argues that many resistance techniques in fact rely on informal networks and and alliances judges form within the courts (at domestic and supranational level) and with other non-judicial actors. The chapter hence offers a unique view at resistance via informality and extra-judicial activities that help judges form resistance alliances and decrease the window of opportunity of erosion actors to attack and strip them of power.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Judicial Resistance: The Shield and The Sword of Informality

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    How do courts react to political interferences? A lot has been written on populist and autocratic leaders rigging the courts. Last decades are full of examples showing that courts can indeed be an easy target for governments enjoying large parliamentary majorities and little respect to the rule of law. Examples from Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Ukraine, Turkey, Bolivia, or the USA confirm that political leaders skilfully navigate through a set of informal and formal strategies how to manipulate courts’s composition and decision-making. Nevertheless, only minor attention has so far been devoted to judicial reactions to political interferences. As this chapter demonstrates, courts are no passive observers of court-rigging efforts. On the contrary, they do retaliate implementing a wide scope of strategies going way beyond formal legal review of their government’s actions. This chapter analyses examples of judicial reactions to political interferences and zeroes in on the role of informal tools, practices and techniques in building democratic resilience of courts. Offering a categorization of resistance strategies, it argues that many resistance techniques in fact rely on informal networks and and alliances judges form within the courts (at domestic and supranational level) and with other non-judicial actors. The chapter hence offers a unique view at resistance via informality and extra-judicial activities that help judges form resistance alliances and decrease the window of opportunity of erosion actors to attack and strip them of power.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    C - Kapitola v odborné knize

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50501 - Law

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2024

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název knihy nebo sborníku

    Informality and Courts

  • ISBN

    9781399535250

  • Počet stran výsledku

    18

  • Strana od-do

    136-153

  • Počet stran knihy

    328

  • Název nakladatele

    Edinburgh University Press

  • Místo vydání

    Edinburgh

  • Kód UT WoS kapitoly