Gazing Into an Abyss: Defining the Non-protected Abstract Matters in EU Copyright Law

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F24%3A00139520" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/24:00139520 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/issues/2024/24-April-2024/gazing-into-an-abyss_67185c72aa.html" target="_blank" >https://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/issues/2024/24-April-2024/gazing-into-an-abyss_67185c72aa.html</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.38023/8bbed4fc-76b7-45e4-86ef-798d3524d66a" target="_blank" >10.38023/8bbed4fc-76b7-45e4-86ef-798d3524d66a</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Gazing Into an Abyss: Defining the Non-protected Abstract Matters in EU Copyright Law

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Thanks to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the requirement of “sufficient precision and objectivity” became a further cornerstone of the, as of now harmonized, notion of work (“Werkbegriff”). This requirement shall provide for legal certainty of third parties as regards to the extent of protected subject matter. The borderline is formed, inter alia, by the direct opposite, i.e., abstract matters. The main aim of this contribution is to concretely define the abstract (sic!) in copyright law. To achieve this aim the contribution firstly shortly explains the requirement of “sufficient precision and objectivity” as introduced by CJEU. In this step the “definitions of non-protected subject matter” are to be observed and synthetised and thus a picture of “the void” in copyright protection should be formed. As the “abstractness” is mostly encountered in the area of computer programs, this subject matter should be regarded the primary focus of the study. Moreover, the patent law deals in extensive matter what is not to be protected on the basis of being abstract, i.e., being a “non-invention”. To find out these boundaries, EPO conclusions in the area of computer-implemented inventions are utilised. In the end, the contribution shall find common regulatory features in these two areas of intellectual property law and discuss what conclusions could be theoretically applicable to the delimitation of the authorial work and to contribute to the ongoing debate on the scope of the protected subject matter in the EU copyright law.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Gazing Into an Abyss: Defining the Non-protected Abstract Matters in EU Copyright Law

Popis výsledku anglicky

Thanks to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the requirement of “sufficient precision and objectivity” became a further cornerstone of the, as of now harmonized, notion of work (“Werkbegriff”). This requirement shall provide for legal certainty of third parties as regards to the extent of protected subject matter. The borderline is formed, inter alia, by the direct opposite, i.e., abstract matters. The main aim of this contribution is to concretely define the abstract (sic!) in copyright law. To achieve this aim the contribution firstly shortly explains the requirement of “sufficient precision and objectivity” as introduced by CJEU. In this step the “definitions of non-protected subject matter” are to be observed and synthetised and thus a picture of “the void” in copyright protection should be formed. As the “abstractness” is mostly encountered in the area of computer programs, this subject matter should be regarded the primary focus of the study. Moreover, the patent law deals in extensive matter what is not to be protected on the basis of being abstract, i.e., being a “non-invention”. To find out these boundaries, EPO conclusions in the area of computer-implemented inventions are utilised. In the end, the contribution shall find common regulatory features in these two areas of intellectual property law and discuss what conclusions could be theoretically applicable to the delimitation of the authorial work and to contribute to the ongoing debate on the scope of the protected subject matter in the EU copyright law.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA22-22517S" target="_blank" >GA22-22517S: Díla chráněná autorským právem a požadavek dostatečné přesnosti a objektivity</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Jusletter IT

ISSN

1664-848X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

Neuveden

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

April

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

451-457

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85196424807