The relationship between the digital services act and the artificial intelligence liability directive

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F25%3A00140769" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/25:00140769 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/en/issues/2025/20-Februar-2025/the-relationship-bet_3d26cb3884.html__ONCE&login=false" target="_blank" >https://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/en/issues/2025/20-Februar-2025/the-relationship-bet_3d26cb3884.html__ONCE&login=false</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.38023/84f925ea-4655-40c7-a0fe-06f8e80e0ea4" target="_blank" >10.38023/84f925ea-4655-40c7-a0fe-06f8e80e0ea4</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The relationship between the digital services act and the artificial intelligence liability directive

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The increasing reliance on artificial intelligence (AI) for content moderation on digital platforms introduces regulatory challenges when AI systems mistakenly remove lawful content. The European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) establishes a framework for platform responsibilities, emphasizing transparency and user rights. However, it does not comprehensively address AI-driven errors. To bridge this gap, the AI Act and the proposed Artificial Intelligence Liability Directive (AILD) introduce liability mechanisms for damages caused by AI-based moderation. This paper examines the interaction between these regulatory instruments, analyzing how the AI Act classifies content moderation as a high-risk AI application requiring human oversight, and how the AILD facilitates claims for damages caused by algorithmic errors. The author assesses whether platform operators’ liability under Article 54 of the DSA extends to cases of AI-driven content removal, and whether the AILD provides a clearer framework for redress.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The relationship between the digital services act and the artificial intelligence liability directive

Popis výsledku anglicky

The increasing reliance on artificial intelligence (AI) for content moderation on digital platforms introduces regulatory challenges when AI systems mistakenly remove lawful content. The European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) establishes a framework for platform responsibilities, emphasizing transparency and user rights. However, it does not comprehensively address AI-driven errors. To bridge this gap, the AI Act and the proposed Artificial Intelligence Liability Directive (AILD) introduce liability mechanisms for damages caused by AI-based moderation. This paper examines the interaction between these regulatory instruments, analyzing how the AI Act classifies content moderation as a high-risk AI application requiring human oversight, and how the AILD facilitates claims for damages caused by algorithmic errors. The author assesses whether platform operators’ liability under Article 54 of the DSA extends to cases of AI-driven content removal, and whether the AILD provides a clearer framework for redress.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Jusletter IT

ISSN

1664-848X

e-ISSN

1664-848X

Svazek periodika

22

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

63-71

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105013675602