Law Applicable to Copyright Ownership: National Treatment Principle in Tension with Legacy Copyright Treaties

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F25%3A00141701" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/25:00141701 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2025.1.217.246" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2025.1.217.246</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2025.1.217.246" target="_blank" >10.17323/2072-8166.2025.1.217.246</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Law Applicable to Copyright Ownership: National Treatment Principle in Tension with Legacy Copyright Treaties

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The present article examines a potential conflict between the national treatment principle, which is enshrined in most significant multilateral copyright treaties, on the one hand, and legacy copyright treaties – primarily bilateral ones, but also certain multilateral treaties such as the Montevideo Convention – containing conflict-of-laws rules not fully compatible with the national treatment principle, on the other. The analysis places special focus on the conflict-of-laws issue of copyright ownership. While the national treatment principle is often interpreted as mandating the application of lex loci protectionis, some legacy copyright treaties prescribe the application of lex originis or use other connecting factors for determining the law applicable to copyright ownership. The paper analyzes how such conflicts are to be resolved, focusing particularly on the interpretation of Article 20 of the Berne Convention. Through examination of case law and scholarly views, it is argued that Article 20 allows for the application of particular provisions of legacy copyright treaties on the condition that their application implies granting authors/rightholders in the particular case more extensive rights, even if these provisions contradict the national treatment principle, which is one of the fundamental principles of the Berne Convention and, in general, of modern international copyright law. It is concluded that courts must assess the applicability of provisions contained in specific international treaties on a case-by-case basis, striving to reconcile competing provisions where feasible, in line with the principle of systemic interpretation inherent in international law. Overall, the analysis reveals that the applicability of conflict-of-laws rules contained in legacy copyright treaties, which might be non-compliant with the national treatment principle, is, under certain conditions, not excluded, even when the Berne Convention is on the particular case generally applicable. The complex relationship between sources of particular international law requires a nuanced approach to resolving potential conflicts between them.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Law Applicable to Copyright Ownership: National Treatment Principle in Tension with Legacy Copyright Treaties

Popis výsledku anglicky

The present article examines a potential conflict between the national treatment principle, which is enshrined in most significant multilateral copyright treaties, on the one hand, and legacy copyright treaties – primarily bilateral ones, but also certain multilateral treaties such as the Montevideo Convention – containing conflict-of-laws rules not fully compatible with the national treatment principle, on the other. The analysis places special focus on the conflict-of-laws issue of copyright ownership. While the national treatment principle is often interpreted as mandating the application of lex loci protectionis, some legacy copyright treaties prescribe the application of lex originis or use other connecting factors for determining the law applicable to copyright ownership. The paper analyzes how such conflicts are to be resolved, focusing particularly on the interpretation of Article 20 of the Berne Convention. Through examination of case law and scholarly views, it is argued that Article 20 allows for the application of particular provisions of legacy copyright treaties on the condition that their application implies granting authors/rightholders in the particular case more extensive rights, even if these provisions contradict the national treatment principle, which is one of the fundamental principles of the Berne Convention and, in general, of modern international copyright law. It is concluded that courts must assess the applicability of provisions contained in specific international treaties on a case-by-case basis, striving to reconcile competing provisions where feasible, in line with the principle of systemic interpretation inherent in international law. Overall, the analysis reveals that the applicability of conflict-of-laws rules contained in legacy copyright treaties, which might be non-compliant with the national treatment principle, is, under certain conditions, not excluded, even when the Berne Convention is on the particular case generally applicable. The complex relationship between sources of particular international law requires a nuanced approach to resolving potential conflicts between them.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics

ISSN

2072-8166

e-ISSN

2072-8166

Svazek periodika

18

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

RU - Ruská federace

Počet stran výsledku

30

Strana od-do

217-246

Kód UT WoS článku

001506988600009

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—