Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Extensiveness of Enroachment as an Obstacle to Technological Progress in Tax Administration

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F25%3A00142163" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/25:00142163 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://sic.pravo.upjs.sk/ecasopis/132025-2/9_Svobodova_Radvan_Extensiveness.pdf" target="_blank" >http://sic.pravo.upjs.sk/ecasopis/132025-2/9_Svobodova_Radvan_Extensiveness.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.33542/SIC2025-2-09" target="_blank" >10.33542/SIC2025-2-09</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Extensiveness of Enroachment as an Obstacle to Technological Progress in Tax Administration

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The electronization of public administration and the incorporation of technological progress is a goal that the Czech Republic tends to pursue across the political sphere and the public. Tax administration should not be an exception in this area, yet the full electronification of processes has not yet been achieved. Is the reason for this development a restrained approach by the legislator or a lack of flexibility by the tax administrator who fails to adapt to technological progress? This is what these paper aims to answer. The authors examine several tools reflecting technological progress that have been implemented by the legislator in the legislative framework or by the tax administrator through its innovative approach in practice. These tools were chosen in relation to the course of the tax proceedings – the initiation of the proceedings through the tax claim, the communication between the tax administrator and the taxpayer during the proceedings, and last but not least, the evidentiary situation decisive for the tax assessment. By analysing the legal framework and, in particular, the current available case law, the authors conclude that while the legislator generally tends to electronicise the processes, their practical impact on streamlining and simplifying the processes is, however, questionable and, as a result, favours mainly tax subjects in practice.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Extensiveness of Enroachment as an Obstacle to Technological Progress in Tax Administration

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The electronization of public administration and the incorporation of technological progress is a goal that the Czech Republic tends to pursue across the political sphere and the public. Tax administration should not be an exception in this area, yet the full electronification of processes has not yet been achieved. Is the reason for this development a restrained approach by the legislator or a lack of flexibility by the tax administrator who fails to adapt to technological progress? This is what these paper aims to answer. The authors examine several tools reflecting technological progress that have been implemented by the legislator in the legislative framework or by the tax administrator through its innovative approach in practice. These tools were chosen in relation to the course of the tax proceedings – the initiation of the proceedings through the tax claim, the communication between the tax administrator and the taxpayer during the proceedings, and last but not least, the evidentiary situation decisive for the tax assessment. By analysing the legal framework and, in particular, the current available case law, the authors conclude that while the legislator generally tends to electronicise the processes, their practical impact on streamlining and simplifying the processes is, however, questionable and, as a result, favours mainly tax subjects in practice.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50501 - Law

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Studia Iuridica Cassoviensia

  • ISSN

    1339-3995

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    13

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    2

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    SK - Slovenská republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    17

  • Strana od-do

    161-177

  • Kód UT WoS článku

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-105020697072