Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Designation of the Safe Countries of Origin in EU Member States: Uniform Rules, Divergent Practices? CV v Ministerstvo vnitra ČR

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F25%3A00142226" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/25:00142226 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/62.4/COLA2025062" target="_blank" >https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/62.4/COLA2025062</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/cola2025062" target="_blank" >10.54648/cola2025062</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Designation of the Safe Countries of Origin in EU Member States: Uniform Rules, Divergent Practices? CV v Ministerstvo vnitra ČR

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    This aritcle analyzes the developments in understanding the concept of the safe countries of origin in the European Union. It discusses the recent CJEU's judgment C-406/22 CV and its implications. It shows that this ruling imposes a stricter, uniform rule that requires full territorial safety for a country to be designated as a "safe country of origin". Then this article argues that, despite this ruling, tensions remain between the CJEU's interpretation and the political will of some Member States. Some Member States have different national lists of "safe countries of origin". The European Commission has proposed a common EU list, which would be mandatory, but Member States can still add their own countries to their national lists. The use of national lists is still permitted by the new asylum legislation, which could maintain divergent practices. The ruling also emphasizes the need for effective judicial review of national SCO designations, even as the EU moves towards more accelerated procedures. In sum, the recet CJEU's case law highlight the ongoing tension between the EU's goal of a more uniform asylum system and the reality of EU Member States retaining some discretion, especially regarding the designation of "safe countries of origin".

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Designation of the Safe Countries of Origin in EU Member States: Uniform Rules, Divergent Practices? CV v Ministerstvo vnitra ČR

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    This aritcle analyzes the developments in understanding the concept of the safe countries of origin in the European Union. It discusses the recent CJEU's judgment C-406/22 CV and its implications. It shows that this ruling imposes a stricter, uniform rule that requires full territorial safety for a country to be designated as a "safe country of origin". Then this article argues that, despite this ruling, tensions remain between the CJEU's interpretation and the political will of some Member States. Some Member States have different national lists of "safe countries of origin". The European Commission has proposed a common EU list, which would be mandatory, but Member States can still add their own countries to their national lists. The use of national lists is still permitted by the new asylum legislation, which could maintain divergent practices. The ruling also emphasizes the need for effective judicial review of national SCO designations, even as the EU moves towards more accelerated procedures. In sum, the recet CJEU's case law highlight the ongoing tension between the EU's goal of a more uniform asylum system and the reality of EU Member States retaining some discretion, especially regarding the designation of "safe countries of origin".

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50501 - Law

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Common Market Law Review

  • ISSN

    0165-0750

  • e-ISSN

    1875-8320

  • Svazek periodika

    62

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    4

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    NL - Nizozemsko

  • Počet stran výsledku

    24

  • Strana od-do

    1155-1178

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001660559100006

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus