A Feminist Critique of Traditional Patriarchal Professional Stereotypes: The Example of the Czech Custody Justice System

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F25%3A00143647" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/25:00143647 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-032-06885-9" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-032-06885-9</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-06885-9" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-032-06885-9</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A Feminist Critique of Traditional Patriarchal Professional Stereotypes: The Example of the Czech Custody Justice System

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article examines the limitations of the Czech custody justice system, focusing on parental custody disputes and the impact of traditional patriarchal professional stereotypes. Drawing from in-depth interviews with legal professionals and experts, it elucidates the intersecting social, legal, and systemic factors contributing to the system’s failure in seeking consensual solutions post-divorce or separation. The article starts by highlighting entrenched societal perceptions wherein divorce is deemed a failure, leading to a blame-driven environment and a preference for court intervention rather than dialogue between parents. The article highlights legal barriers, revealing how custody categorisation sparks debates and intensifies conflicts, often hindering the promotion of joint custody and complicating parental responsibilities. It emphasises the role of the Office for Social and Legal Protection of Children (OSPOD), advocating for a shift from its current extensive role to a focus on mediating parental disputes, urging a child-centric approach. Furthermore, the piece critiques inadequate involvement of the child in decision-making processes, advocating for a more inclusive mechanism that considers children’s perspectives and needs as integral to custody decisions. The article emphasises the necessity for a multidisciplinary approach to challenge stereotypes, biases, and professional norms, stressing the importance of diverse expertise, collaboration, and parental and societal education regarding the significance of consensual resolutions in order to safeguard the child’s best interest. In conclusion, the article calls for transcending traditional gender and professional roles, exposing biases inherent in the custody justice system, and advocates for a child-centric approach to transform the custody justice system towards more consensual and holistic approach.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A Feminist Critique of Traditional Patriarchal Professional Stereotypes: The Example of the Czech Custody Justice System

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article examines the limitations of the Czech custody justice system, focusing on parental custody disputes and the impact of traditional patriarchal professional stereotypes. Drawing from in-depth interviews with legal professionals and experts, it elucidates the intersecting social, legal, and systemic factors contributing to the system’s failure in seeking consensual solutions post-divorce or separation. The article starts by highlighting entrenched societal perceptions wherein divorce is deemed a failure, leading to a blame-driven environment and a preference for court intervention rather than dialogue between parents. The article highlights legal barriers, revealing how custody categorisation sparks debates and intensifies conflicts, often hindering the promotion of joint custody and complicating parental responsibilities. It emphasises the role of the Office for Social and Legal Protection of Children (OSPOD), advocating for a shift from its current extensive role to a focus on mediating parental disputes, urging a child-centric approach. Furthermore, the piece critiques inadequate involvement of the child in decision-making processes, advocating for a more inclusive mechanism that considers children’s perspectives and needs as integral to custody decisions. The article emphasises the necessity for a multidisciplinary approach to challenge stereotypes, biases, and professional norms, stressing the importance of diverse expertise, collaboration, and parental and societal education regarding the significance of consensual resolutions in order to safeguard the child’s best interest. In conclusion, the article calls for transcending traditional gender and professional roles, exposing biases inherent in the custody justice system, and advocates for a child-centric approach to transform the custody justice system towards more consensual and holistic approach.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

The Gender and the Judiciary

ISBN

9783032068842

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

285-304

Počet stran knihy

384

Název nakladatele

Springer Nature Switzerland AG

Místo vydání

Švýcarsko

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—