Between the Spillover and the Spillout: Tracing the Evolution of the Czech Global Justice Movement
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F10%3A00046339" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/10:00046339 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/41132925?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents" target="_blank" >https://www.jstor.org/stable/41132925?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Between the Spillover and the Spillout: Tracing the Evolution of the Czech Global Justice Movement
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article conceptually and empirically focuses on various dimensions of the Czech Global Justice Movement (GJM) dynamics. In discussions on the Western GJM it is possible to distinguish two main perspectives on the movements evolution, which were formulated in different contexts. One view claims that no such single movement exists anymore; it has already declined (or spilled out into different field of activism). The other view argues that the movement is undergoing profound changes but its major principles and identity, at least latently, have survived. The aim of this article is twofold. First, it strives to re-introduce the concepts of spillover and spillout as multidimensional social processes and operationalise them to apply to the evolution ofthe Czech GJM between 2003 and 2009.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Between the Spillover and the Spillout: Tracing the Evolution of the Czech Global Justice Movement
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article conceptually and empirically focuses on various dimensions of the Czech Global Justice Movement (GJM) dynamics. In discussions on the Western GJM it is possible to distinguish two main perspectives on the movements evolution, which were formulated in different contexts. One view claims that no such single movement exists anymore; it has already declined (or spilled out into different field of activism). The other view argues that the movement is undergoing profound changes but its major principles and identity, at least latently, have survived. The aim of this article is twofold. First, it strives to re-introduce the concepts of spillover and spillout as multidimensional social processes and operationalise them to apply to the evolution ofthe Czech GJM between 2003 and 2009.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50600 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2010
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
SOCIOLOGICKY CASOPIS-CZECH SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW
ISSN
0038-0288
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
46
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
32
Strana od-do
—
Kód UT WoS článku
000286496500003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—