How Stable and Reasonable is Postcommunist Public Opinion? The Case of the Czech Republic.
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F14%3A00094500" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/14:00094500 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09668136.2014.900973#.U_NPqPldX9U" target="_blank" >http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09668136.2014.900973#.U_NPqPldX9U</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2014.900973" target="_blank" >10.1080/09668136.2014.900973</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
How Stable and Reasonable is Postcommunist Public Opinion? The Case of the Czech Republic.
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The quality of democracy depends on both politicians and citizens. While most attention has focused on politicians, this paper looks lat citizens. There has been some scepticism about whether the postcommunist public is prepared to rule their countries. The legacies of communism and the rigours of the transition may have produced citizens whose opinions are unstable and ill-informed and therefore a poor basis for democratic policy making. This paper tests this proposition by considering the nature of public opinion in the Czech Republic. Its main conclusion is that postcommunist public opinion is more reasonable than conventional wisdom suggests. Opinions on most policies change slowly if at all and when they do change the changes are prompted more by gradual shifts in mores than by political manipulation. This suggests that citizens in the region are prepared to have a significant voice in policy making.
Název v anglickém jazyce
How Stable and Reasonable is Postcommunist Public Opinion? The Case of the Czech Republic.
Popis výsledku anglicky
The quality of democracy depends on both politicians and citizens. While most attention has focused on politicians, this paper looks lat citizens. There has been some scepticism about whether the postcommunist public is prepared to rule their countries. The legacies of communism and the rigours of the transition may have produced citizens whose opinions are unstable and ill-informed and therefore a poor basis for democratic policy making. This paper tests this proposition by considering the nature of public opinion in the Czech Republic. Its main conclusion is that postcommunist public opinion is more reasonable than conventional wisdom suggests. Opinions on most policies change slowly if at all and when they do change the changes are prompted more by gradual shifts in mores than by political manipulation. This suggests that citizens in the region are prepared to have a significant voice in policy making.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GAP408%2F11%2F0709" target="_blank" >GAP408/11/0709: Soudobé výzvy demokracii ve středovýchodní Evropě</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Europe-Asia Studies
ISSN
0966-8136
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
66
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
20
Strana od-do
925-944
Kód UT WoS článku
000340188700004
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-84904608999