Motivation for Environmental Direct Action in the Czech Republic: The Case of the 2011 Blockade at the Šumava National Park

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F15%3A00084712" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/15:00084712 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://socstudia.fss.muni.cz/sites/default/files/03_Motivation_for_Environmental_Direct_Action_Pelikan_Librova.pdf" target="_blank" >http://socstudia.fss.muni.cz/sites/default/files/03_Motivation_for_Environmental_Direct_Action_Pelikan_Librova.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Motivation for Environmental Direct Action in the Czech Republic: The Case of the 2011 Blockade at the Šumava National Park

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article is a case study of the most significant Czech environmental direct-action over the past few years?the blockade that was to stop the logging taking place in a wilderness zone of the Šumava National Park in the summer 2011. The empirical findings draw on two surveys that were carried out among the blockade participants more than a year apart. The article focuses on the participants? motivation. The types of motivation are analyzed by the three types of motivation categories as they are formulated in normative ethics: teleological, deontological, and virtue ethics. Results are interpreted within the context of normative ethics and of theories dealing with the dynamics of contention. The theoretical premise is that different types of motivation for environmentally-oriented behavior contain different levels of expectations, and through these expectations they carry different levels of the potential for disappointment and resignation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Motivation for Environmental Direct Action in the Czech Republic: The Case of the 2011 Blockade at the Šumava National Park

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article is a case study of the most significant Czech environmental direct-action over the past few years?the blockade that was to stop the logging taking place in a wilderness zone of the Šumava National Park in the summer 2011. The empirical findings draw on two surveys that were carried out among the blockade participants more than a year apart. The article focuses on the participants? motivation. The types of motivation are analyzed by the three types of motivation categories as they are formulated in normative ethics: teleological, deontological, and virtue ethics. Results are interpreted within the context of normative ethics and of theories dealing with the dynamics of contention. The theoretical premise is that different types of motivation for environmentally-oriented behavior contain different levels of expectations, and through these expectations they carry different levels of the potential for disappointment and resignation.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AO - Sociologie, demografie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Sociální studia

ISSN

1214-813X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

XII

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

26

Strana od-do

27-52

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—