A Failed Comeback? Understanding Iranian Policies in the South Caucasus

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F16%3A00090884" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/16:00090884 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19448953.2016.1196024" target="_blank" >http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19448953.2016.1196024</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2016.1196024" target="_blank" >10.1080/19448953.2016.1196024</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A Failed Comeback? Understanding Iranian Policies in the South Caucasus

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper examines the evolution of Iran’s foreign policy toward the three South Caucasian republics since 2010 until today. Focusing on a topic that has remained on the margins of scholarly interest, this article identifies and tracks a number of key issues relating to Tehran’s policy toward Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia. These issues include limited and rather bilateral cooperation on the Caspian oil and natural gas transit; Iran’s interference in Azerbaijan’s internal affairs; the issue of Iranian Azerbaijan in the relationship between Baku and Tehran; Iran’s relationship with Armenia over energy, transportation, and economic cooperation; and Iran’s predominantly economic relationship with Georgia. The article concludes that Iran has profiled itself as an important, yet rather cautious actor in the South Caucasus, which has reduced its clout to the north-west of its borders.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A Failed Comeback? Understanding Iranian Policies in the South Caucasus

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper examines the evolution of Iran’s foreign policy toward the three South Caucasian republics since 2010 until today. Focusing on a topic that has remained on the margins of scholarly interest, this article identifies and tracks a number of key issues relating to Tehran’s policy toward Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia. These issues include limited and rather bilateral cooperation on the Caspian oil and natural gas transit; Iran’s interference in Azerbaijan’s internal affairs; the issue of Iranian Azerbaijan in the relationship between Baku and Tehran; Iran’s relationship with Armenia over energy, transportation, and economic cooperation; and Iran’s predominantly economic relationship with Georgia. The article concludes that Iran has profiled itself as an important, yet rather cautious actor in the South Caucasus, which has reduced its clout to the north-west of its borders.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies

ISSN

1944-8953

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

18

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

448-464

Kód UT WoS článku

000384678600002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—