JUS POST BELLUM AND ITS APPLICATION ON UNITED KINGDOM PARTICIPATION IN THE 2003 IRAQ WAR

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F16%3A00092741" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/16:00092741 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

JUS POST BELLUM AND ITS APPLICATION ON UNITED KINGDOM PARTICIPATION IN THE 2003 IRAQ WAR

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The just war tradition is a set of criteria stemming from moral philosophy. It is a normative approach which aims to determine the rules of proper conduct. Although the idea of just war has a long tradition, the just conclusion of war has received little attention. The jus post bellum principles have developed only over the last three decades. The paper uses Brian Orend’s set of criteria, as he has dealt with the issue of jus post bellum most profoundly and systematically. Out of the principles of the just termination of war laid out by Orend, the UK did not meet the rehabilitation criterion, as it did not have a sound plan for the situation in post-war Iraq, and thus it made some mistakes that could have been avoided. Furthermore, it did not meet the principle of proportionality and publicity either. Based on available resources, it cannot be ruled out that the disarmament and respecting the armament sanctions imposed on Iraq by the SC UN could have been accomplished without the regime change.

Název v anglickém jazyce

JUS POST BELLUM AND ITS APPLICATION ON UNITED KINGDOM PARTICIPATION IN THE 2003 IRAQ WAR

Popis výsledku anglicky

The just war tradition is a set of criteria stemming from moral philosophy. It is a normative approach which aims to determine the rules of proper conduct. Although the idea of just war has a long tradition, the just conclusion of war has received little attention. The jus post bellum principles have developed only over the last three decades. The paper uses Brian Orend’s set of criteria, as he has dealt with the issue of jus post bellum most profoundly and systematically. Out of the principles of the just termination of war laid out by Orend, the UK did not meet the rehabilitation criterion, as it did not have a sound plan for the situation in post-war Iraq, and thus it made some mistakes that could have been avoided. Furthermore, it did not meet the principle of proportionality and publicity either. Based on available resources, it cannot be ruled out that the disarmament and respecting the armament sanctions imposed on Iraq by the SC UN could have been accomplished without the regime change.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Conference: International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences and Arts

ISBN

9786197105735

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

205-212

Název nakladatele

SGEM

Místo vydání

Albena

Místo konání akce

Albena

Datum konání akce

1. 1. 2016

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000395726900027