First Year of the Arms Trade Treaty – Conceived to be dead on arrival or an ember to be stoked?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F16%3A00120262" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/16:00120262 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61989592:15210/16:33161664
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
First Year of the Arms Trade Treaty – Conceived to be dead on arrival or an ember to be stoked?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Challenging explanations are offered by current scholarship on the motivation driving responsible arms transfer implementations and the possible merits of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT). While polarizing perspectives are to be expected on such a landmark treaty, early practical impact assessments remain negativistic. At the same time however, much of the literature and popular opinion credits the ATT with “norm establishment” achievements and it is the subject of this article to scrutinize what those norms actually are. The presented paper outlines the starkest deficiencies of the ATT, perceived prior to and after its adoption. The findings provide a basis for a data grounded discussion of the contending explanations of motivations to weaken the treaty to such an extent, as well as adopt its final form between the realist explanation of norm contestations by state modernism, economic justifications, procedural concerns, and liberal militarism. Although the article finds that all four explanations can be anecdotally supported, it posits that none of the four positions are in isolation capable of a full explanation for major stakeholders’ behavior and proceeds to amalgamate a joint explanation with factors influencing resistance to joining or promoting a stronger global conventional arms trade regulation standard.
Název v anglickém jazyce
First Year of the Arms Trade Treaty – Conceived to be dead on arrival or an ember to be stoked?
Popis výsledku anglicky
Challenging explanations are offered by current scholarship on the motivation driving responsible arms transfer implementations and the possible merits of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT). While polarizing perspectives are to be expected on such a landmark treaty, early practical impact assessments remain negativistic. At the same time however, much of the literature and popular opinion credits the ATT with “norm establishment” achievements and it is the subject of this article to scrutinize what those norms actually are. The presented paper outlines the starkest deficiencies of the ATT, perceived prior to and after its adoption. The findings provide a basis for a data grounded discussion of the contending explanations of motivations to weaken the treaty to such an extent, as well as adopt its final form between the realist explanation of norm contestations by state modernism, economic justifications, procedural concerns, and liberal militarism. Although the article finds that all four explanations can be anecdotally supported, it posits that none of the four positions are in isolation capable of a full explanation for major stakeholders’ behavior and proceeds to amalgamate a joint explanation with factors influencing resistance to joining or promoting a stronger global conventional arms trade regulation standard.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
SGEM 2016, BK 2 : Political Sciences and Law Proceedings, Vol. II,
ISBN
9786197105735
ISSN
2367-5659
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
165-172
Název nakladatele
International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences & Arts
Místo vydání
Sofia, Bulgaria
Místo konání akce
Albena
Datum konání akce
1. 1. 2016
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
EUR - Evropská akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000395726900022