Cities and Regions in Competition? Negotiations for the 2014-2020 Programming Period in the Czech Republic
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F17%3A00094645" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/17:00094645 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/tras.2017.0006" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/tras.2017.0006</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/tras.2017.0006" target="_blank" >10.24193/tras.2017.0006</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Cities and Regions in Competition? Negotiations for the 2014-2020 Programming Period in the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Over the past two decades, the concept ofmulti-level governance (MLG) has been increasinglydiscussed by scholars in the fi eld of Europeanintegration. While Gary Marks wrote abouta four-level arrangement (supranational, national,regional, and local), over time the regionaland local levels often became lumped togetheras ‘substate actors’ and so easily conceptuallyinterchangeable. This text, however, showsthe fallaciousness of this reasoning. In certaincircumstances we can fi nd a competitive relationshipbetween cities and regions, positioningthemselves against each other for resources andaccess to national and supranational fora, especiallyin the context of the new regionalism. Thecities have been given substantial support fromthe European Commission in recent years andwe argue that this new constellation may havea remarkable infl uence on relations and possiblyalso lead to confl icts among local and regionalactors in EU multi-level governance. This waspossible to be clearly seen in the Czech Republic(CR) between 2012 and 2014, when heatednegotiations took place regarding the implementationof the Integrated Territorial Investment(ITI), a fi nancial instrument of EU Cohesion Policywhich was implemented on the substate level– i.e., in cities and regions. In the CR this competitiontook place in a specifi c context, which alsoinfl uenced its outcome.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Cities and Regions in Competition? Negotiations for the 2014-2020 Programming Period in the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku anglicky
Over the past two decades, the concept ofmulti-level governance (MLG) has been increasinglydiscussed by scholars in the fi eld of Europeanintegration. While Gary Marks wrote abouta four-level arrangement (supranational, national,regional, and local), over time the regionaland local levels often became lumped togetheras ‘substate actors’ and so easily conceptuallyinterchangeable. This text, however, showsthe fallaciousness of this reasoning. In certaincircumstances we can fi nd a competitive relationshipbetween cities and regions, positioningthemselves against each other for resources andaccess to national and supranational fora, especiallyin the context of the new regionalism. Thecities have been given substantial support fromthe European Commission in recent years andwe argue that this new constellation may havea remarkable infl uence on relations and possiblyalso lead to confl icts among local and regionalactors in EU multi-level governance. This waspossible to be clearly seen in the Czech Republic(CR) between 2012 and 2014, when heatednegotiations took place regarding the implementationof the Integrated Territorial Investment(ITI), a fi nancial instrument of EU Cohesion Policywhich was implemented on the substate level– i.e., in cities and regions. In the CR this competitiontook place in a specifi c context, which alsoinfl uenced its outcome.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA13-24657S" target="_blank" >GA13-24657S: Evropa 2020: Horizont proměny relevantních aktérů politického systému České republiky</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
ISSN
1842-2845
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2017
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
50E
Stát vydavatele periodika
RO - Rumunsko
Počet stran výsledku
20
Strana od-do
90-109
Kód UT WoS článku
000397181700006
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85013152302