The proportion of integrationists among Czech psychotherapists and counselors : A comparison of multiple criteria
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F17%3A00096746" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/17:00096746 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000069" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000069</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000069" target="_blank" >10.1037/int0000069</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The proportion of integrationists among Czech psychotherapists and counselors : A comparison of multiple criteria
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
A psychotherapist’s integrationism/eclecticism can be operationalized in different ways. Existing studies estimating the proportion of integrationists/eclectics typically utilized a single criterion, often yielding incomparable results. The goal of this study was to estimate the prevalence of integrationism/eclecticism using four different criteria based on psychotherapy training, self-identified theoretical orientation and the use of psychotherapy techniques. The analysis was based on questionnaire data obtained from N = 373 Czech psychotherapy and counseling practitioners in an online survey. The proportion of integrationists was estimated to be 21.7, 32.7, 87.7, and 98.9 percent, depending on the criterion used. Furthermore, the endorsement of several types of integration was estimated and the frequency of combinations of the main theoretical orientations was explored. The findings are discussed in the context of previous studies and emphasize the role of adequate operationalization of integrationism. The results suggest that while the self-rated theoretical orientation may reflect a practitioner’s professional identity and affiliation, measurement on the level of techniques may be more sensitive to the real-life integration of various orientations.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The proportion of integrationists among Czech psychotherapists and counselors : A comparison of multiple criteria
Popis výsledku anglicky
A psychotherapist’s integrationism/eclecticism can be operationalized in different ways. Existing studies estimating the proportion of integrationists/eclectics typically utilized a single criterion, often yielding incomparable results. The goal of this study was to estimate the prevalence of integrationism/eclecticism using four different criteria based on psychotherapy training, self-identified theoretical orientation and the use of psychotherapy techniques. The analysis was based on questionnaire data obtained from N = 373 Czech psychotherapy and counseling practitioners in an online survey. The proportion of integrationists was estimated to be 21.7, 32.7, 87.7, and 98.9 percent, depending on the criterion used. Furthermore, the endorsement of several types of integration was estimated and the frequency of combinations of the main theoretical orientations was explored. The findings are discussed in the context of previous studies and emphasize the role of adequate operationalization of integrationism. The results suggest that while the self-rated theoretical orientation may reflect a practitioner’s professional identity and affiliation, measurement on the level of techniques may be more sensitive to the real-life integration of various orientations.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50100 - Psychology and cognitive sciences
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Psychotherapy Integration
ISSN
1053-0479
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
27
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
13-22
Kód UT WoS článku
000423038800003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85007559125