Differences in Adolescents’ Response Decision and Evaluation for Face-to-Face and Cyber Victimization

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F19%3A00108970" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/19:00108970 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0272431618806052" target="_blank" >https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0272431618806052</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272431618806052" target="_blank" >10.1177/0272431618806052</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Differences in Adolescents’ Response Decision and Evaluation for Face-to-Face and Cyber Victimization

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The current study was designed to assess early adolescents’ response evaluation and decision for hypothetical peer victimization vignettes. Participants were 336 (59% girls; X age = 12.55) seventh and eighth graders from one school in the Midwestern United States. Adolescents read a hypothetical online or offline social situation and answered questions designed to access internal congruence, response evaluation, response efficacy, emotional outcome expectancy, and social outcome expectancy. Girls were more likely to believe that aggressive responses online and offline would lead to positive social and emotional outcome expectancies when compared with boys. Adolescents were more likely to believe that offline and online aggressive responses were legitimate responses to face-to-face victimization, feel that aggressive responses online or offline were easier to execute in response to face-to-face victimization, and that aggressive responses online or offline would lead to positive emotions and better social outcomes.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Differences in Adolescents’ Response Decision and Evaluation for Face-to-Face and Cyber Victimization

Popis výsledku anglicky

The current study was designed to assess early adolescents’ response evaluation and decision for hypothetical peer victimization vignettes. Participants were 336 (59% girls; X age = 12.55) seventh and eighth graders from one school in the Midwestern United States. Adolescents read a hypothetical online or offline social situation and answered questions designed to access internal congruence, response evaluation, response efficacy, emotional outcome expectancy, and social outcome expectancy. Girls were more likely to believe that aggressive responses online and offline would lead to positive social and emotional outcome expectancies when compared with boys. Adolescents were more likely to believe that offline and online aggressive responses were legitimate responses to face-to-face victimization, feel that aggressive responses online or offline were easier to execute in response to face-to-face victimization, and that aggressive responses online or offline would lead to positive emotions and better social outcomes.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50100 - Psychology and cognitive sciences

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Early Adolescence

ISSN

0272-4316

e-ISSN

1552-5449

Svazek periodika

39

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

8

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

1110-1128

Kód UT WoS článku

000484526600002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85059066408