The Myth of Protection : Gendering Protection under the Responsibility to Protect in Gaza

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F19%3A00109176" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/19:00109176 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://brill.com/abstract/journals/gr2p/11/1/article-p77_77.xml" target="_blank" >https://brill.com/abstract/journals/gr2p/11/1/article-p77_77.xml</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-01101005" target="_blank" >10.1163/1875984X-01101005</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Myth of Protection : Gendering Protection under the Responsibility to Protect in Gaza

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Although international norms on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P ), norms stemming from United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 and the agenda of Women, Peace and Security (wps) have shifted the narrative from a state-centric to a human-centric approach to security, they have failed to intersect in the most difficult contexts. This paper examines the intersections between Pillar iii of R2P, Resolution 1325 and the agenda of wps with a focus on protection in Gaza. Within the Gaza context, all authorities can be seen as failing in their responsibility to protect, however, no steps have been taken toward operationalisation of protection under R2P. Examining protection through a gendered lens provides a critical mirror of strategies of protection as well as a roadmap towards improvement. The article argues that R2P in combination with the agenda of wps provides a potential tool for constructing a consensus prioritising protection of civilians in the most difficult contexts.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Myth of Protection : Gendering Protection under the Responsibility to Protect in Gaza

Popis výsledku anglicky

Although international norms on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P ), norms stemming from United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 and the agenda of Women, Peace and Security (wps) have shifted the narrative from a state-centric to a human-centric approach to security, they have failed to intersect in the most difficult contexts. This paper examines the intersections between Pillar iii of R2P, Resolution 1325 and the agenda of wps with a focus on protection in Gaza. Within the Gaza context, all authorities can be seen as failing in their responsibility to protect, however, no steps have been taken toward operationalisation of protection under R2P. Examining protection through a gendered lens provides a critical mirror of strategies of protection as well as a roadmap towards improvement. The article argues that R2P in combination with the agenda of wps provides a potential tool for constructing a consensus prioritising protection of civilians in the most difficult contexts.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EF16_027%2F0008360" target="_blank" >EF16_027/0008360: Postdoc@MUNI</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Global Responsibility to Protect

ISSN

1875-9858

e-ISSN

1875-984X

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

27

Strana od-do

77-103

Kód UT WoS článku

000641033400003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85060443623