Introduction and Framing of the Book

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F19%3A00109902" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/19:00109902 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.cambridgescholars.com/handbook-for-theory-research-and-practice-in-gestalt-therapy-2nd-edition" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridgescholars.com/handbook-for-theory-research-and-practice-in-gestalt-therapy-2nd-edition</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Introduction and Framing of the Book

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The issue of warrant is explored here: what constitutes sufficient justification for the practice of gestalt therapy? Might it be, they wondered, the so-called evidence provided through randomly assigned clinical trials? Might it reasonably include other types of interventions, treatments, and techniques? Indeed, what constitutes the evidence in the construct of evidence-based practice? Is it process outcomes studies? Is it gestalt-informed qualitative research? Is it the common factors research or the practice-based or client-centered outcomes? Do we look exclusively to the university and its largely group studies using convenient student populations or do we move beyond the university and its reduction of variables to the messy world of larger clinical practice? The answer relates to the issue of the gulf between research findings and clinical practice–the application of research to practice.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Introduction and Framing of the Book

Popis výsledku anglicky

The issue of warrant is explored here: what constitutes sufficient justification for the practice of gestalt therapy? Might it be, they wondered, the so-called evidence provided through randomly assigned clinical trials? Might it reasonably include other types of interventions, treatments, and techniques? Indeed, what constitutes the evidence in the construct of evidence-based practice? Is it process outcomes studies? Is it gestalt-informed qualitative research? Is it the common factors research or the practice-based or client-centered outcomes? Do we look exclusively to the university and its largely group studies using convenient student populations or do we move beyond the university and its reduction of variables to the messy world of larger clinical practice? The answer relates to the issue of the gulf between research findings and clinical practice–the application of research to practice.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Handbook for Theory, Research, and Practice in Gestalt Therapy

ISBN

9781527527874

Počet stran výsledku

25

Strana od-do

2-26

Počet stran knihy

446

Název nakladatele

Cambridge Scholars Publishing

Místo vydání

Newcastle upon Tyne

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—