Why did she leave? Development of working alliance in a case of psychotherapy for depression

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F19%3A00110309" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/19:00110309 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.researchinpsychotherapy.org/index.php/rpsy/article/view/354" target="_blank" >https://www.researchinpsychotherapy.org/index.php/rpsy/article/view/354</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2019.354" target="_blank" >10.4081/ripppo.2019.354</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Why did she leave? Development of working alliance in a case of psychotherapy for depression

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The present case study aims to explore the unfolding of the working alliance in a case that ended with the client dropping out of psychotherapy, unilaterally cutting off her contact with the therapist. However, both quantitative and qualitative outcome assessments strongly suggested that. An analysis of session transcripts, the Client Change Interview, and the Interpersonal Process Recall interviews for three selected sessions was used to analyze the development of the working alliance and its contribution to the dropout. This case study illustrates how the working alliance is constructed differently during the different phases of the therapeutic process. Specifically, the fruitful problem-solving in the first part of psychotherapy helped the client to improve her functioning. Yet this intervention seemed to exhaust its potential over time, and later the dyad had trouble finding another useful mode of interaction due to the interpersonal context,leading to more serious ruptures and, eventually, to the dropout. The findings are discussed in terms of therapist responsiveness and of its role in the continuous negotiation of the working alliance.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Why did she leave? Development of working alliance in a case of psychotherapy for depression

Popis výsledku anglicky

The present case study aims to explore the unfolding of the working alliance in a case that ended with the client dropping out of psychotherapy, unilaterally cutting off her contact with the therapist. However, both quantitative and qualitative outcome assessments strongly suggested that. An analysis of session transcripts, the Client Change Interview, and the Interpersonal Process Recall interviews for three selected sessions was used to analyze the development of the working alliance and its contribution to the dropout. This case study illustrates how the working alliance is constructed differently during the different phases of the therapeutic process. Specifically, the fruitful problem-solving in the first part of psychotherapy helped the client to improve her functioning. Yet this intervention seemed to exhaust its potential over time, and later the dyad had trouble finding another useful mode of interaction due to the interpersonal context,leading to more serious ruptures and, eventually, to the dropout. The findings are discussed in terms of therapist responsiveness and of its role in the continuous negotiation of the working alliance.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Research in Psychotherapy : Psychopathology, Process and Outcome

ISSN

2239-8031

e-ISSN

2499-7552

Svazek periodika

22

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

IT - Italská republika

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

150-164

Kód UT WoS článku

000477993500003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85071849981