Great Expectations or Misplaced Hopes? The Role of the Visegrád Group in the Brexit Process

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F19%3A00110525" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/19:00110525 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09668136.2019.1643825" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09668136.2019.1643825</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2019.1643825" target="_blank" >10.1080/09668136.2019.1643825</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Great Expectations or Misplaced Hopes? The Role of the Visegrád Group in the Brexit Process

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article explores the role played by the Visegrád Group—a multilateral platform of four Central and Eastern European states (the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia)—in the Brexit process. It surveys the group’s performance during two distinct phases of the Brexit process: first, David Cameron’s EU renegotiations and, second, the first phase of the Article 50 (withdrawal) negotiations, ending in December 2017. The author concludes that while the group managed to maximise its clout in the case of EU renegotiations, it has been much less effective during the withdrawal negotiations in the period under study.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Great Expectations or Misplaced Hopes? The Role of the Visegrád Group in the Brexit Process

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article explores the role played by the Visegrád Group—a multilateral platform of four Central and Eastern European states (the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia)—in the Brexit process. It surveys the group’s performance during two distinct phases of the Brexit process: first, David Cameron’s EU renegotiations and, second, the first phase of the Article 50 (withdrawal) negotiations, ending in December 2017. The author concludes that while the group managed to maximise its clout in the case of EU renegotiations, it has been much less effective during the withdrawal negotiations in the period under study.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50600 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Europe-Asia Studies

ISSN

0966-8136

e-ISSN

1465-3427

Svazek periodika

71

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

8

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

24

Strana od-do

1261-1284

Kód UT WoS článku

000484036900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85065702048