Social imaginaries and the limits of differential meaning : A cultural sociological critique of symbolic meaning structures
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F19%3A00111337" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/19:00111337 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11614-019-00371-2" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11614-019-00371-2</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11614-019-00371-2" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11614-019-00371-2</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Social imaginaries and the limits of differential meaning : A cultural sociological critique of symbolic meaning structures
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Elaborating on theories of the social imaginary, this contribution addresses the shortcomings of a differential conception of meaning, which is widespread in the social and cultural sciences. After a brief literature review, a preliminary concept of the social imaginary and its sociological relevance will be outlined drawing on the works of Taylor and others. The theoretical argument of this article, the fundamental difference and complementarity between the differential logic of the symbolic and the fuzzy logic of the imaginary, will be developed in a discussion of structuralism and one of its most fervent critics: Castoriadis. The latter developed his account of the social imaginary as a critique of Marxist reductionism, of the structuralist analysis of language and totemism, and of "ensemblistic-identitarian logic" in general. The social imaginary, as a reservoir of meaning and condition for the emergence of new meanings, not only illuminates the blind spots in these theories, but also has the potential to transform our thinking about culture and society.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Social imaginaries and the limits of differential meaning : A cultural sociological critique of symbolic meaning structures
Popis výsledku anglicky
Elaborating on theories of the social imaginary, this contribution addresses the shortcomings of a differential conception of meaning, which is widespread in the social and cultural sciences. After a brief literature review, a preliminary concept of the social imaginary and its sociological relevance will be outlined drawing on the works of Taylor and others. The theoretical argument of this article, the fundamental difference and complementarity between the differential logic of the symbolic and the fuzzy logic of the imaginary, will be developed in a discussion of structuralism and one of its most fervent critics: Castoriadis. The latter developed his account of the social imaginary as a critique of Marxist reductionism, of the structuralist analysis of language and totemism, and of "ensemblistic-identitarian logic" in general. The social imaginary, as a reservoir of meaning and condition for the emergence of new meanings, not only illuminates the blind spots in these theories, but also has the potential to transform our thinking about culture and society.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50401 - Sociology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie
ISSN
1011-0070
e-ISSN
1862-2585
Svazek periodika
44
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
Supplement 2
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
19
Strana od-do
17-35
Kód UT WoS článku
000496294000002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85075156638