Active and passive : two ways party systems influence electoral outcomes

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F19%3A00111509" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/19:00111509 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-political-science-review/article/active-and-passive-two-ways-party-systems-influence-electoral-outcomes/98E25052FEBD5367117957FB9512E9DB" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-political-science-review/article/active-and-passive-two-ways-party-systems-influence-electoral-outcomes/98E25052FEBD5367117957FB9512E9DB</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1755773919000250" target="_blank" >10.1017/S1755773919000250</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Active and passive : two ways party systems influence electoral outcomes

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Parties can not only actively adjust the electoral rules to reach more favourable outcomes, as is most often recognized in political science, but they also passively create an environment that systematically influences electoral competition. This link is theorized and included in the wider framework capturing the mutual dependence of electoral systems and party systems. The impact of passive influence is successfully tested on one out of two factors closely related to party systems: choice set size (i.e., number of options provided to voters) and degree of ideological polarization. The research utilizes established datasets (i.e., Constituency-Level Elections Archive, Party System Polarization Index, Chapel Hill Expert Survey, and Manifesto Project Database) and via regression analysis with clustered robust standard errors concludes that the choice set size constitutes an attribute with passive influence over electoral systems. Thus, it must be reflected when outcomes of electoral systems are estimated or compared across various contexts.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Active and passive : two ways party systems influence electoral outcomes

Popis výsledku anglicky

Parties can not only actively adjust the electoral rules to reach more favourable outcomes, as is most often recognized in political science, but they also passively create an environment that systematically influences electoral competition. This link is theorized and included in the wider framework capturing the mutual dependence of electoral systems and party systems. The impact of passive influence is successfully tested on one out of two factors closely related to party systems: choice set size (i.e., number of options provided to voters) and degree of ideological polarization. The research utilizes established datasets (i.e., Constituency-Level Elections Archive, Party System Polarization Index, Chapel Hill Expert Survey, and Manifesto Project Database) and via regression analysis with clustered robust standard errors concludes that the choice set size constitutes an attribute with passive influence over electoral systems. Thus, it must be reflected when outcomes of electoral systems are estimated or compared across various contexts.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Political Science Review

ISSN

1755-7739

e-ISSN

1755-7747

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

451-467

Kód UT WoS článku

000503861700003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85077002623