In Risk We Trust/Editing Embryos and Mirroring Future Risks and Uncertainties
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F19%3A00111795" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/19:00111795 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11019-018-9851-0.pdf" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11019-018-9851-0.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-018-9851-0" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11019-018-9851-0</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
In Risk We Trust/Editing Embryos and Mirroring Future Risks and Uncertainties
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Tendencies and efforts have shifted from genome description, DNA mapping, and DNA sequencing to active and profound re-programming, repairing life on genetic and molecular levels in some parts of contemporary life science research. Mirroring and materializing this atmosphere, various life engineering technologies have been used and established in many areas of life sciences in the last decades. A c ontemporary progressive example of one such technology is DNA editing. Novel developments related to reproductive technologies, particularly embryo editing, prenatal human life engineering, and germline engineering need to be analy zed against the broader social and structural background. The crucial analytical scope for this paper is a specific field: the life -editing technologies used in reproductive medicine and performed experimentally on viable human embryos, particularly CRISPR/Cas9 technology. This text argues that germline editing technologies, as a representative part of contemporary biomedicine, are merging ideas of treatment and enhancement to avoid future risks. Using this specific life manipulation of embryos and gametes, the text analyzes these processes within the concept of power over life – biopower and the specific governing rationality that imagines, classifies , and governs contemporary societies. The text specifically focuses on the potential to create, define, and manage future risks and uncertainties related to prenatal life. (PDF) In Risk We Trust/ Editing Embryos and Mirroring Future Risks and Uncertainties.
Název v anglickém jazyce
In Risk We Trust/Editing Embryos and Mirroring Future Risks and Uncertainties
Popis výsledku anglicky
Tendencies and efforts have shifted from genome description, DNA mapping, and DNA sequencing to active and profound re-programming, repairing life on genetic and molecular levels in some parts of contemporary life science research. Mirroring and materializing this atmosphere, various life engineering technologies have been used and established in many areas of life sciences in the last decades. A c ontemporary progressive example of one such technology is DNA editing. Novel developments related to reproductive technologies, particularly embryo editing, prenatal human life engineering, and germline engineering need to be analy zed against the broader social and structural background. The crucial analytical scope for this paper is a specific field: the life -editing technologies used in reproductive medicine and performed experimentally on viable human embryos, particularly CRISPR/Cas9 technology. This text argues that germline editing technologies, as a representative part of contemporary biomedicine, are merging ideas of treatment and enhancement to avoid future risks. Using this specific life manipulation of embryos and gametes, the text analyzes these processes within the concept of power over life – biopower and the specific governing rationality that imagines, classifies , and governs contemporary societies. The text specifically focuses on the potential to create, define, and manage future risks and uncertainties related to prenatal life. (PDF) In Risk We Trust/ Editing Embryos and Mirroring Future Risks and Uncertainties.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50400 - Sociology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
ISSN
1386-7423
e-ISSN
1572-8633
Svazek periodika
22
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
191-200
Kód UT WoS článku
000466946200004
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85053671240