The ‘refugee crisis rhapsody’ : Variations on cultural closeness in Central European refugee discourses

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F19%3A00112869" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/19:00112869 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.imiscoe.org/2019-imiscoe-annual-conference" target="_blank" >https://www.imiscoe.org/2019-imiscoe-annual-conference</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The ‘refugee crisis rhapsody’ : Variations on cultural closeness in Central European refugee discourses

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Over the past decades, tens of thousands of people fleeing from African and Middle Eastern countries have tried to enter the European Union. The peak of the arrivals, between 2015 and 2016, was accompanied by heated discussions about the redistribution of asylum applicants, border protection, and the European asylum system, at both national and the European levels. Loud voices were heard from Central Europe, especially when a compulsory refugee relocation mechanism was proposed and adopted at the EU level. This paper provides insight into political discourses in two Central European countries – Czech Republic and Slovakia, which both adopted a strong negative stand against the relocation system. It examines how cultural diversity and state sovereignty are used in political discourses as frames to problematise the EU’s refugee resettlement system, creating boundaries, symbolic and social, between different groups of refugees. The boundary between deserving and undeserving refugees is built upon national identity in the Czech discourse and upon religious identity in the Slovak discourse.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The ‘refugee crisis rhapsody’ : Variations on cultural closeness in Central European refugee discourses

Popis výsledku anglicky

Over the past decades, tens of thousands of people fleeing from African and Middle Eastern countries have tried to enter the European Union. The peak of the arrivals, between 2015 and 2016, was accompanied by heated discussions about the redistribution of asylum applicants, border protection, and the European asylum system, at both national and the European levels. Loud voices were heard from Central Europe, especially when a compulsory refugee relocation mechanism was proposed and adopted at the EU level. This paper provides insight into political discourses in two Central European countries – Czech Republic and Slovakia, which both adopted a strong negative stand against the relocation system. It examines how cultural diversity and state sovereignty are used in political discourses as frames to problematise the EU’s refugee resettlement system, creating boundaries, symbolic and social, between different groups of refugees. The boundary between deserving and undeserving refugees is built upon national identity in the Czech discourse and upon religious identity in the Slovak discourse.

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50401 - Sociology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů