European discourse : what difference does it make in the national coordination of the European agenda?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F20%3A00113980" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/20:00113980 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1653127" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1653127</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1653127" target="_blank" >10.1080/23745118.2019.1653127</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

European discourse : what difference does it make in the national coordination of the European agenda?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Coordination systems of the European agenda in EU Member states have been mostly examined thought three traditional neo-institutional approaches. Historical, rational choice and sociological institutional approaches greatly vary in explaining what causes changes in EU affairs coordination structures. We propose that such disagreement is caused by their focus on exogenous static changes, not paying sufficient attention to the role that daily communication of EU affairs may have on the way they are coordinated. Our article fills this gap by analysing the impact of communicative discourse of EU issues in the Czech Republic. Using discursive institutionalism as a point of departure and using critical discursive analysis, we found that the case of a coalition with pro-European discourse did not confirm the expectations about the decentralization of coordination system. On the contrary, the coordination system moved back towards a centralized system.

Název v anglickém jazyce

European discourse : what difference does it make in the national coordination of the European agenda?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Coordination systems of the European agenda in EU Member states have been mostly examined thought three traditional neo-institutional approaches. Historical, rational choice and sociological institutional approaches greatly vary in explaining what causes changes in EU affairs coordination structures. We propose that such disagreement is caused by their focus on exogenous static changes, not paying sufficient attention to the role that daily communication of EU affairs may have on the way they are coordinated. Our article fills this gap by analysing the impact of communicative discourse of EU issues in the Czech Republic. Using discursive institutionalism as a point of departure and using critical discursive analysis, we found that the case of a coalition with pro-European discourse did not confirm the expectations about the decentralization of coordination system. On the contrary, the coordination system moved back towards a centralized system.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA18-05612S" target="_blank" >GA18-05612S: Sjednoceni v rozdílech; Příspěvek zemí Visegrádu k tématu vícerychlostní integrace Evropské unie</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Politics and Society

ISSN

2374-5118

e-ISSN

2374-5126

Svazek periodika

21

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

399-417

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85071176971