Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

A cost-benefit analysis of the environmental taxation policy in China : A frontier analysis-based environmentally extended input-output optimization method

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F20%3A00129299" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/20:00129299 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jiec.12947" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jiec.12947</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12947" target="_blank" >10.1111/jiec.12947</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    A cost-benefit analysis of the environmental taxation policy in China : A frontier analysis-based environmentally extended input-output optimization method

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    China's high-speed economic development and reliance on overconsumption of natural resources have led to serious environmental pollution. Environmental taxation is seen as an effective economic tool to help mitigate air pollution. In order to assess the effects of different scenarios of environmental taxation policies, we propose a frontier-based environmentally extended input–output optimization model with explicit emission abatement sectors to reflect the inputs and benefits of abatement. Frontier analysis ensures policy scenarios are assessed under the same technical efficiency benchmark, while input–output analysis depicts the wide range of economic transactions among sectors of an economy. Four scenarios are considered in this study, which are increasing specific tax rates of SO2, NOx, and soot and dust separately and increasing all three tax rates simultaneously. Our estimation results show that: raising tax rates of SO2, NOx, and soot and dust simultaneously would have the highest emission reduction effects, with the SO2 tax rate making the greatest contribution to emission reduction. Raising the soot and dust tax rate is the most environmentally friendly strategy due to its highest abatement to welfare through avoided health costs. The combination of frontier analysis and input–output analysis provides policy makers a comprehensive and sectoral approach to assess costs and benefits of environmental taxation.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    A cost-benefit analysis of the environmental taxation policy in China : A frontier analysis-based environmentally extended input-output optimization method

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    China's high-speed economic development and reliance on overconsumption of natural resources have led to serious environmental pollution. Environmental taxation is seen as an effective economic tool to help mitigate air pollution. In order to assess the effects of different scenarios of environmental taxation policies, we propose a frontier-based environmentally extended input–output optimization model with explicit emission abatement sectors to reflect the inputs and benefits of abatement. Frontier analysis ensures policy scenarios are assessed under the same technical efficiency benchmark, while input–output analysis depicts the wide range of economic transactions among sectors of an economy. Four scenarios are considered in this study, which are increasing specific tax rates of SO2, NOx, and soot and dust separately and increasing all three tax rates simultaneously. Our estimation results show that: raising tax rates of SO2, NOx, and soot and dust simultaneously would have the highest emission reduction effects, with the SO2 tax rate making the greatest contribution to emission reduction. Raising the soot and dust tax rate is the most environmentally friendly strategy due to its highest abatement to welfare through avoided health costs. The combination of frontier analysis and input–output analysis provides policy makers a comprehensive and sectoral approach to assess costs and benefits of environmental taxation.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50704 - Environmental sciences (social aspects)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GA16-17978S" target="_blank" >GA16-17978S: Zranitelnost a ekonomicko-energetický nexus v odvětvích hospodářství - historická, Input-Output a CGE analýza</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2020

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Journal of Industrial Ecology

  • ISSN

    1088-1980

  • e-ISSN

    1530-9290

  • Svazek periodika

    24

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    3

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    13

  • Strana od-do

    564-576

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000486668600001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85073833961