Who does not protect democracy? : Examining the role of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F21%3A00118994" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/21:00118994 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886921004025" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886921004025</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111027" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.paid.2021.111027</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Who does not protect democracy? : Examining the role of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This study investigates how right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict one's tendency to protect basic democratic principles. Structural equation modelling of questionnaire data (N = 220) showed that social dominance orientation clearly predicted greater disregard for basic democratic principles, operationalized using the sacred-value-protection model as the extent to which one accepts monetarization of democratic procedures (e.g., election). By contrast, right-wing authoritarianism was associated with an ambivalent approach to democratic principles. While there was a small indirect effect between right-wing authoritarianism and protection of democratic principles, mediated by distrust in politicians, it was counterbalanced by an additional positive direct effect between these variables. Overall, results show that right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance relate differently to people's views of democracy.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Who does not protect democracy? : Examining the role of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation
Popis výsledku anglicky
This study investigates how right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict one's tendency to protect basic democratic principles. Structural equation modelling of questionnaire data (N = 220) showed that social dominance orientation clearly predicted greater disregard for basic democratic principles, operationalized using the sacred-value-protection model as the extent to which one accepts monetarization of democratic procedures (e.g., election). By contrast, right-wing authoritarianism was associated with an ambivalent approach to democratic principles. While there was a small indirect effect between right-wing authoritarianism and protection of democratic principles, mediated by distrust in politicians, it was counterbalanced by an additional positive direct effect between these variables. Overall, results show that right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance relate differently to people's views of democracy.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50100 - Psychology and cognitive sciences
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA18-19883S" target="_blank" >GA18-19883S: Psychologické determinanty vnímané demokratické legitimity</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Personality and Individual Differences
ISSN
0191-8869
e-ISSN
1873-3549
Svazek periodika
181
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
October
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
4
Strana od-do
1-4
Kód UT WoS článku
000674647300006
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85107142041