Not Quite What You Expected : The Curious Case of Brexit Scrutiny in the Czech Parliament

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F21%3A00120478" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/21:00120478 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://academic.oup.com/pa/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pa/gsz026/5543520" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/pa/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pa/gsz026/5543520</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsz026" target="_blank" >10.1093/pa/gsz026</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Not Quite What You Expected : The Curious Case of Brexit Scrutiny in the Czech Parliament

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim of the article is to explore how the Czech bicameral parliament has reacted to the process of the United Kingdom's (UK's) withdrawal from the European Union (EU). Drawing upon insights from the theoretical expectations of parliamentary power, the inquiry researches the ways that Czech legislatures have developed in terms of engaging with and influencing the Brexit process. In this regard, the Czech case is exceptionally interesting and worth exploring, since the EU agenda has become a highly politicised issue within the Czech context. The significance of this inquiry has been further highlighted by the high level of party-based Euroscepticism typical of Czech politics as well as the frequent changes that the Czech party system has been undergoing in recent years. Throughout the in-depth analysis of parliamentary scrutiny activities—conceptualised as comprising four aspects: (i) the institutional adjustment; (ii) articulation of priorities; (iii) interactions with the government and (iv) parliamentary party politics—the article considers how these activities compare between both chambers of the Czech Parliament.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Not Quite What You Expected : The Curious Case of Brexit Scrutiny in the Czech Parliament

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim of the article is to explore how the Czech bicameral parliament has reacted to the process of the United Kingdom's (UK's) withdrawal from the European Union (EU). Drawing upon insights from the theoretical expectations of parliamentary power, the inquiry researches the ways that Czech legislatures have developed in terms of engaging with and influencing the Brexit process. In this regard, the Czech case is exceptionally interesting and worth exploring, since the EU agenda has become a highly politicised issue within the Czech context. The significance of this inquiry has been further highlighted by the high level of party-based Euroscepticism typical of Czech politics as well as the frequent changes that the Czech party system has been undergoing in recent years. Throughout the in-depth analysis of parliamentary scrutiny activities—conceptualised as comprising four aspects: (i) the institutional adjustment; (ii) articulation of priorities; (iii) interactions with the government and (iv) parliamentary party politics—the article considers how these activities compare between both chambers of the Czech Parliament.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50600 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Parliamentary Affairs

ISSN

0031-2290

e-ISSN

1460-2482

Svazek periodika

74

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

23

Strana od-do

79-101

Kód UT WoS článku

000649353100004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85112473140