Information exchange networks at the climate science-policy interface : Evidence from theCzech Republic, Finland, Ireland, and Portugal

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F21%3A00120580" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/21:00120580 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gove.12484" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gove.12484</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gove.12484" target="_blank" >10.1111/gove.12484</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Information exchange networks at the climate science-policy interface : Evidence from theCzech Republic, Finland, Ireland, and Portugal

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Scientifically informed climate policymaking starts with the exchange of credible, salient, and legitimate scientific information between scientists and policy makers. It is therefore important to understand what explains the exchange of scientific information in national climate policymaking processes. This article applies exponential random graph models to network data from the Czech Republic, Finland, Ireland, and Portugal to investigate which types of organizations are favored sources of scientific information and whether actors obtain scientific information from those with similar beliefs as their own. Results show that scientific organizations are favored sources in all countries, while only in the Czech Republic do actors obtain scientific information from those with similar policy beliefs. These findings suggest that actors involved in climate policymaking mostly look to scientific organizations for information, but that in polarized contexts where there is a presence of influential denialists overcoming biased information exchange is a challenge.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Information exchange networks at the climate science-policy interface : Evidence from theCzech Republic, Finland, Ireland, and Portugal

Popis výsledku anglicky

Scientifically informed climate policymaking starts with the exchange of credible, salient, and legitimate scientific information between scientists and policy makers. It is therefore important to understand what explains the exchange of scientific information in national climate policymaking processes. This article applies exponential random graph models to network data from the Czech Republic, Finland, Ireland, and Portugal to investigate which types of organizations are favored sources of scientific information and whether actors obtain scientific information from those with similar beliefs as their own. Results show that scientific organizations are favored sources in all countries, while only in the Czech Republic do actors obtain scientific information from those with similar policy beliefs. These findings suggest that actors involved in climate policymaking mostly look to scientific organizations for information, but that in polarized contexts where there is a presence of influential denialists overcoming biased information exchange is a challenge.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Governance

ISSN

0952-1895

e-ISSN

1468-0491

Svazek periodika

34

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

211-228

Kód UT WoS článku

000513248000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85079459174